Literature DB >> 9699405

The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition.

N Stucki1, B Ingervall.   

Abstract

The effect of the Jasper Jumper in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions was studied in 26 consecutive 13-25-year-old patients. The median treatment time was 5 months, followed by a median period of observation or retention of 7 months. The effects of the treatment were evaluated from cephalograms taken before the treatment, at the removal of the Jumpers and at the end of the period of observation or retention. The Jumpers brought about a slight retrusion of the maxilla and markedly increased the mandibular prognathism. The maxillary incisors and molars were retruded, and the mandibular incisors and molars protruded. The median correction of the overjet was almost 5 mm and of the molar relationship 3 mm. The intrusive forces of the Jumper resulted in a transient intrusion of the maxillary molars and the mandibular incisors. After the period of retention and observation, the dento-alveolar effects had partially or totally relapsed. The remaining effect contributing most to the correction was the skeletal effect on the mandible, i.e. the increase in mandibular prognathism. The skeletal mandibular effect was the same in younger and older subjects. At the end of observation about 60 per cent of the overjet reduction and 75 per cent of the molar correction remained. The incidence of breakage of the Jumpers was 9 per cent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9699405     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of Forsus FRD EZ and Andresen activator in the treatment of class II, division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Fundagül Bilgiç; Güvenç Başaran; Orhan Hamamci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Julia von Bremen; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Madhur Upadhyay; Sumit Yadav; K Nagaraj; Flavio Uribe; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.

Authors:  Aditya Chhibber; Madhur Upadhyay; Flavio Uribe; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Banu Erbas; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage.

Authors:  Belma I Aslan; Ebru Kucukkaraca; Cagri Turkoz; Mufide Dincer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Effects of Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with three types of fixed functional appliances.

Authors:  Deborah Brindeiro de Araújo Brito; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Camilla Foncatti Fiedler; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-11-11

8.  Interceptive Orthodontics and Growth Modification Therapy with Fixed Functional Appliance: A Case Report.

Authors:  M S Ravi; Jatin Ahuja
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2011-04-15

9.  Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults.

Authors:  Bruno D'Aurea Furquim; Guilherme Janson; Laura de Castro Cabrera Cope; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 May-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.