Literature DB >> 9698776

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol in hypertensive patients after sublingual administration: systemic availability.

A P Mansur1, S D Avakian, R S Paula, H Donzella, S R Santos, J A Ramires.   

Abstract

The bioavailability of propranolol depends on the degree of liver metabolism. Orally but not intravenously administered propranolol is heavily metabolized. In the present study we assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sublingual propranolol. Fourteen severely hypertensive patients (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 115 mmHg), aged 40 to 66 years, were randomly chosen to receive a single dose of 40 mg propranolol hydrochloride by sublingual or peroral administration. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, heart rate (HR) for pharmacodynamics and blood samples for noncompartmental pharmacokinetics were obtained at baseline and at 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the single dose. Significant reductions in BP and HR were obtained, but differences in these parameters were not observed when sublingual and peroral administrations were compared as follows: SBP (17 vs 18%, P = NS), DBP (14 vs 8%, P = NS) and HR (22 vs 28%, P = NS), respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters obtained after sublingual or peroral drug administration were: peak plasma concentration (CMAX): 147 +/- 72 vs 41 +/- 12 ng/ml, P < 0.05; time to reach CMAX (TMAX): 34 +/- 18 vs 52 +/- 11 min, P < 0.05; biological half-life (t1/2b): 0.91 +/- 0.54 vs 2.41 +/- 1.16 h, P < 0.05; area under the curve (AUCT): 245 +/- 134 vs 79 +/- 54 ng h-1 ml-1, P < 0.05; total body clearance (CLT/F): 44 +/- 23 vs 26 +/- 12 ml min-1 kg-1, P = NS. Systemic availability measured by the AUCT ratio indicates that extension of bioavailability was increased 3 times by the sublingual route. Mouth paresthesia was the main adverse effect observed after sublingual administration. Sublingual propranolol administration showed a better pharmacokinetic profile and this route of administration may be an alternative for intravenous or oral administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9698776     DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x1998000500014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res        ISSN: 0100-879X            Impact factor:   2.590


  8 in total

1.  Association of Weight-Adjusted Caffeine and β-Blocker Use With Ophthalmology Fellow Performance During Simulated Vitreoretinal Microsurgery.

Authors:  Marina Roizenblatt; Vitor Dias Gomes Barrios Marin; Alex Treiger Grupenmacher; Felipe Muralha; Jean Faber; Kim Jiramongkolchai; Peter Louis Gehlbach; Michel Eid Farah; Rubens Belfort; Mauricio Maia
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic Variability of Drugs Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine.

Authors:  Peer Tfelt-Hansen; Frederik Nybye Ågesen; Agniezka Pavbro; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Biological sample preparation by using restricted-access nanoparticles prepared from bovine serum albumin: application to liquid chromatographic determination of β-blockers.

Authors:  Mariana Azevedo Rosa; Henrique Dipe De Faria; Diailison Teixeira Carvalho; Eduardo Costa Figueiredo
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 5.833

4.  Nanoclay-Based Composite Films for Transdermal Drug Delivery: Development, Characterization, and in silico Modeling and Simulation.

Authors:  Muhammad Sikandar; Muhammad Harris Shoaib; Rabia Ismail Yousuf; Farrukh Rafiq Ahmed; Fatima Ramzan Ali; Muhammad Talha Saleem; Kamran Ahmed; Sana Sarfaraz; Sabahat Jabeen; Fahad Siddiqui; Tazeen Husain; Faaiza Qazi; Muhammad Suleman Imtiaz
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 5.  Potential implications of DMET ontogeny on the disposition of commonly prescribed drugs in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  Siavosh Naji-Talakar; Sheena Sharma; Leslie A Martin; Derek Barnhart; Bhagwat Prasad
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Propranolol Targets Hemangioma Stem Cells via cAMP and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Regulation.

Authors:  Naikhoba C O Munabi; Ryan W England; Andrew K Edwards; Alison A Kitajewski; Qian Kun Tan; Andrew Weinstein; Justin E Kung; Maya Wilcox; Jan K Kitajewski; Carrie J Shawber; June K Wu
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 6.940

7.  Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Over-Responsiveness of Iranian Population to Propranolol.

Authors:  Ebrahim Salehifar; Shima Ebrahim; Mohammad-Reza Shiran; Fatemeh Faramarzi; Hossein Askari Rad; Razieh Avan; Asadollah Mohseni Kiasari; Pouneh Ebrahimi
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2017-06-30

8.  3D Printed Buccal Films for Prolonged-Release of Propranolol Hydrochloride: Development, Characterization and Bioavailability Prediction.

Authors:  Marija Jovanović; Miloš Petrović; Sandra Cvijić; Nataša Tomić; Dušica Stojanović; Svetlana Ibrić; Petar Uskoković
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 6.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.