OBJECTIVES: To report the initial series of needlescopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy and to compare the results with a contemporary series of conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed at the same institution. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent needlescopic adrenalectomy over a 4-month period. Outcome data were retrospectively compared with 21 conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed over the preceding 12-month period at the same institution. The needlescopic technique included three subcostal ports (two, 2 mm; one, 5 mm) and one umbilical port for ultimate specimen extraction (10/12 mm). The laparoscopic technique included four subcostal ports (all 10/12 mm). Endoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy was completed by the standard technique in both groups. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were comparable between the needlescopic (n = 15) and laparoscopic (n = 21) groups. The needlescopic group had a shorter surgical time (169 versus 220 minutes, P = 0.05), less blood loss (61 versus 183 mL, P = 0.002), and shorter hospital stay (1.1 versus 2.7 days, P < 0.001). Convalescence averaged 2.1 weeks in the needlescopic group and 3.1 weeks in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). No significant complications occurred in either group. One patient in the needlescopic group was converted to conventional laparoscopy because of marked obesity; hospital stay in this patient was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Reported herein is the initial series of needlescopic adrenalectomy. Compared with conventional laparoscopy, needlescopic adrenalectomy results in an overnight hospital stay, rapid recovery, and excellent cosmesis. However, prior experience with conventional laparoscopy is essential before embarking on needlescopic surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To report the initial series of needlescopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy and to compare the results with a contemporary series of conventional transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed at the same institution. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent needlescopic adrenalectomy over a 4-month period. Outcome data were retrospectively compared with 21 conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomies performed over the preceding 12-month period at the same institution. The needlescopic technique included three subcostal ports (two, 2 mm; one, 5 mm) and one umbilical port for ultimate specimen extraction (10/12 mm). The laparoscopic technique included four subcostal ports (all 10/12 mm). Endoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy was completed by the standard technique in both groups. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were comparable between the needlescopic (n = 15) and laparoscopic (n = 21) groups. The needlescopic group had a shorter surgical time (169 versus 220 minutes, P = 0.05), less blood loss (61 versus 183 mL, P = 0.002), and shorter hospital stay (1.1 versus 2.7 days, P < 0.001). Convalescence averaged 2.1 weeks in the needlescopic group and 3.1 weeks in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). No significant complications occurred in either group. One patient in the needlescopic group was converted to conventional laparoscopy because of marked obesity; hospital stay in this patient was 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Reported herein is the initial series of needlescopic adrenalectomy. Compared with conventional laparoscopy, needlescopic adrenalectomy results in an overnight hospital stay, rapid recovery, and excellent cosmesis. However, prior experience with conventional laparoscopy is essential before embarking on needlescopic surgery.