Literature DB >> 9697277

Age-adjusted ultrasound risk assessment for fetal Down's syndrome during the second trimester: description of the method and analysis of 142 cases.

D A Nyberg1, D A Luthy, R G Resta, B C Nyberg, M A Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and test a method of individual risk assessment for fetal Down's syndrome based on maternal age and second-trimester ultrasound findings.
DESIGN: A case-control study of 142 fetuses with Down's syndrome was compared with 930 control fetuses with normal karyotype. All patients underwent second-trimester ultrasound at a single institution with a standardized ultrasound protocol without knowledge of fetal karyotype. Age-adjusted ultrasound risk assessment (AAURA) for Down's syndrome was performed by multiplying the a priori risk, based on maternal age, with likelihood ratios resulting from the presence or absence of specific ultrasound findings for each patient. Individual ultrasound findings were assigned likelihood ratios (LR) as follows: structural abnormality (LR 25), nuchal thickening (LR 18.6), echogenic bowel (LR 5.5), shortened humerus (LR 2.5), shortened femur (LR 2.2), echogenic intracardiac focus (LR 2), and renal pyelectasis (LR 1.6). A normal ultrasound was assigned a LR of 0.4.
RESULTS: One or more ultrasound markers were identified in 68.3% (97) of fetuses with Down's syndrome compared to 12.5% of fetuses with normal karyotype. Among fetuses with positive ultrasound, 31% of those with Down's syndrome and 80% of those with normal karyotype showed a single non-structural finding. Using AAURA and a threshold of 1: 200, 74% (105 of 142) of fetuses with Down's syndrome were identified, including 61.5% (24 of 39) from women aged less than 35 years, 67.2% (45 of 67) from women aged 35-39 years inclusively, and 100% (36 of 36) from women aged 40 years or older. AAURA of 930 fetuses with normal karyotype showed an overall false-positive rate of 14.7%, including 4% (21 of 519) from women aged less than 35 years, 12.5% (42 of 337) from women aged 35-39 years inclusively, and 100% from women aged 40 years or older.
CONCLUSIONS: AAURA permits improved individual counselling regarding the risk of fetal Down's syndrome following a second-trimester sonogram. For low-risk women under age 35 years, ultrasound assessment can identify over half of the affected fetuses with Down's syndrome with an acceptable false-positive rate (4%). For women aged 35-39 years, a normal ultrasound can substantially reduce the risk of unnecessary amniocentesis (12.5% from 100%) but will also miss approximately one-third of affected fetuses. Biochemical screening of maternal serum is also suggested for this group. Based on their high a priori risk, women aged 40 years or more should consider genetic amniocentesis regardless of a normal ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9697277     DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12010008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  12 in total

1.  Prenatal Aneuploidies Computerized Screening (SCA TEST): a pilot study on 1000 women.

Authors:  Alessandro Sacco; Claudio Coco; Lucia Mangiafico; Pietro Cignini; Alessandra Tiezzi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2007-10

Review 2.  Imaging clues in the prenatal diagnosis of syndromes and aneuploidy.

Authors:  Judy A Estroff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-03-06

Review 3.  Ultrasonographic soft markers of aneuploidy in second trimester: are we lost?

Authors:  Sameer Raniga; P D Desai; Hetal Parikh
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-01-11

Review 4.  Sonographic markers for early diagnosis of fetal malformations.

Authors:  Maria Daniela Renna; Paola Pisani; Francesco Conversano; Emanuele Perrone; Ernesto Casciaro; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Marco Di Paola; Antonio Perrone; Sergio Casciaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-28

5.  Role of second-trimester genetic sonography after Down syndrome screening.

Authors:  Kjersti M Aagaard-Tillery; Fergal D Malone; David A Nyberg; T Flint Porter; Howard S Cuckle; Karin Fuchs; Lisa Sullivan; Christine H Comstock; George R Saade; Keith Eddleman; Susan Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Diana W Bianchi; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Roy A Filly; Joshua A Copel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Adjusted classification for ultrasound scoring index for antenatal detection of fetal trisomy.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-05

Review 8.  Antenatal hydronephrosis: evaluation and outcome.

Authors:  Christopher S Cooper; Janet I Andrews; Wendy F Hansen; Jerome Yankowitz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  Influence of second-trimester ultrasound markers for Down syndrome in pregnant women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Mariza Rumi Kataguiri; Edward Araujo Júnior; Luiz Claudio Silva Bussamra; Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza; Antonio Fernandes Moron
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-03-25

10.  An ethnic predilection for fetal echogenic intracardiac focus identified during targeted midtrimester ultrasound examination: A retrospective review.

Authors:  Andrei Rebarber; Kenneth A Levey; Edmund Funai; Susan Monda; Michael Paidas
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.