Literature DB >> 9694123

Two reconstructive techniques for flatfoot deformity comparing contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints.

A P McCormack1, H Niki, P Kiser, A F Tencer, B J Sangeorzan.   

Abstract

The effect of two different methods of reconstruction of flatfoot deformity and the role of the posterior tibial tendon on the contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints were quantified using pressure-sensitive film. Each of 10 cadaver feet was loaded quasi-statically by an axial compressive force to simulate varying loads. First, a specimen was tested intact, then it was tested after sectioning the spring ligament and loading the specimen cyclically to create one type of flatfoot deformity. It was then tested again after reconstructing the deformity. Reconstructions used were the Dillwyn-Evans procedure (bone graft in osteotomy of the calcaneus) or the calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis (CCDA). We found that surgically produced flatfoot deformity altered mainly the talonavicular joint, by decreasing its contact area. The Dillwyn-Evans method had less effect on the talonavicular joint (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (3 of 6) and more effect on the anteriomedial facet (altering 3 of 6 parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). The Dillwyn-Evans method had more effect on the posterior facet (altering 2 of 6 measured parameters) than the CCDA (1 of 6). Function of the posterior tibial tendon had no effect on contact characteristics of the hindfoot joints after either type of reconstruction. These findings are based on measurements using a quasi-statically-loaded foot model at three selected positions, and results may be different with dynamic loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9694123     DOI: 10.1177/107110079801900706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  6 in total

Review 1.  Classifications in Brief: Johnson and Strom Classification of Adult-acquired Flatfoot Deformity.

Authors:  Mostafa M Abousayed; Jason P Tartaglione; Andrew J Rosenbaum; John A Dipreta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Minimally invasive, no hardware subtalar arthrodesis with autogenous posterior iliac bone graft.

Authors:  Mohamed A M Eid; Maged Abou El-Soud; Mahmoud A Mahran; Timour F El-Hussieni
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-03-04

Review 3.  The role of orthobiologics in foot and ankle surgery: Allogenic bone grafts and bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  James Wee; Gowreeson Thevendran
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Prevalence of flatfoot among young Korean males and the correlation among flatfoot angles measured in weight-bearing lateral radiographs.

Authors:  Seung Min Ryu; Taeg Ki Lee; Sun Ho Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Effects of five hindfoot arthrodeses on foot and ankle motion: Measurements in cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Kun Zhang; Yanxi Chen; Minfei Qiang; Yini Hao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition.

Authors:  Giovanni Luigi Di Gennaro; Stefano Stallone; Eleonora Olivotto; Paola Zarantonello; Marina Magnani; Tullia Tavernini; Stefano Stilli; Giovanni Trisolino
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.