Literature DB >> 9694122

Three-dimensional analysis of flatfoot deformity: cadaver study.

H B Kitaoka1, Z P Luo, K N An.   

Abstract

Eleven fresh-frozen cadaver foot specimens were tested to define changes in tarsal alignment associated with flatfoot, or pes planus, a common clinical problem. The three-dimensional position of four bones (talus, calcaneus, navicular, and first metatarsal) relative to the fixed tibia was determined with a magnetic tracking system in the intact foot and flatfoot conditions. In the flatfoot, the average metatarsal-to-talar position difference was 11.7 degrees +/-4.4 degrees in abduction (P < 0.0001), 10.4 degrees +/-3.6 degrees in dorsiflexion (P < 0.0001), and 10.9 degrees +/-6.0 degrees in eversion (P < 0.0001) compared with the intact foot. The average calcaneal-to-talar position difference was 2.2 degrees +/-2.6 degrees in abduction (P=0.0171) and 2.7 degrees+/-2.0 degrees in eversion (P=0.0012) compared with the intact foot. The average navicular-to-talar position difference was 13.6 degrees +/-5.0 degrees in abduction (P < 0.0001), 10.5 degrees +/-6.6 degrees in dorsiflexion (P=0.0004), and 8.1 degrees +/-3.8 degrees in eversion (P < 0.0001) compared with normal. The average talar-to-tibial position difference was -8.2 degrees +/-3.2 degrees in dorsiflexion (P < 0.001) compared with the intact foot. The average arch height difference was 6.0+/-2.7 mm (P < 0.0001) less than the normal condition. The deformity associated with flatfoot is complex and occurs in multiple joints and in all three planes. An understanding of the normal and pathologic (flatfoot) conditions is necessary to surgically restore appropriate alignment and function in hindfoot reconstruction operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9694122     DOI: 10.1177/107110079801900705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

1.  Load response of the medial longitudinal arch in patients with flatfoot deformity: in vivo 3D study.

Authors:  Masamitsu Kido; Kazuya Ikoma; Kan Imai; Daisaku Tokunaga; Nozomu Inoue; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Flatfoot and normal foot a comparative analysis of the stress shielding.

Authors:  V Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

3.  Biomechanical Effect of Foot Orthoses on Rearfoot Motions and Joint Moment Parameters in Patients with Flexible Flatfoot.

Authors:  KiHoon Han; Kangho Bae; Nicholas Levine; JungOk Yang; Joong-Sook Lee
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-08

4.  Determination of normal values for navicular drop during walking: a new model correcting for foot length and gender.

Authors:  Rasmus G Nielsen; Michael S Rathleff; Ole H Simonsen; Henning Langberg
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  An in vivo study of hindfoot 3D kinetics in stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD) flatfoot based on weight-bearing CT scan.

Authors:  Y Zhang; J Xu; X Wang; J Huang; C Zhang; L Chen; C Wang; X Ma
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  The effects of hip external rotator exercises and toe-spread exercises on lower extremity muscle activities during stair-walking in subjects with pronated foot.

Authors:  Young-Mi Goo; Da-Yeon Kim; Tae-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31

7.  Comparison of dynamic balance ability in healthy university students according to foot shape.

Authors:  In Hyouk Hyong; Jong Ho Kang
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-02-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.