Literature DB >> 9693811

Time-budgets, comfort behaviours and injurious pecking of turkeys housed in pairs.

C M Sherwin1, A Kelland.   

Abstract

1. Large group size and high stocking density can compromise the welfare of poultry. This study, the first in a series of trials to determine the effect of these factors, examined the behaviour of turkeys under conditions in which group size and stocking density would have minimal influence, that is, when the birds were housed as pairs in pens measuring 3.0 x 3.6 m. 2. The 24 h time-budgets, frequency of comfort behaviours and incidence of injurious pecking were recorded on 12 occasions when the birds were between 4 and 22 weeks of age. 3. Over the duration of the study the proportion of time engaged in drinking or pecking other birds remained constant, but decreased for sleeping, environment pecking, wing-flapping, and running, increased for stretching, and varied throughout for feeding, standing, sitting, strutting, preening whilst standing, preening whilst sitting, and walking. 4. Some of the changes in activity were probably attributable to age effects per se. though other changes may have been related to increased musculo-skeletal weakness. 5. At 18 weeks of age, the turkeys spent a considerable proportion (30%) of time performing a sexual courtship display, strutting. Although the prevalence of this activity subsequently decreased, the likelihood of increased metabolic costs and potential for frustration indicate further investigation is warranted. 6. The turkeys behaved socially and were strongly influenced by social facilitator. 7. There were considerable differences between the behaviour of the turkeys and other common poultry species: the turkeys performed a running or frolicking behaviour and strutting, but did not exhibit other behaviours commonly observed such as dustbathing and ground-scratching whilst feeding. 8. Injurious pecking was infrequent. Only 14 bouts of behaviour likely to cause injury were recorded in 1,656 turkey-hours of continuous observation; no turkey required attention as a consequence of this behaviour. Feather pecking and cannibalism did not occur despite higher than conventional light intensities; the low frequency of injurious pecking could be attributed to the small group size/low stocking density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9693811     DOI: 10.1080/00071669888854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  3 in total

1.  Behavioral responses of turkeys subjected to different climatic conditions.

Authors:  Angélica Signor Mendes; Daniella Jorge de Moura; Isadora Bischoff Nunes; Isabela Lopes Dos Santos; Cleverson de Souza; Gabriela Munhoz Morello; Sabrina Endo Takahashi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  The Prevalence of Integument Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Canadian Turkeys.

Authors:  Emily M Leishman; Nienke van Staaveren; Vern R Osborne; Benjamin J Wood; Christine F Baes; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-07

3.  Heat Stress and an Immune Challenge Influence Turkey Meat Quality, but Conspecific-Directed Pecking Behavior Does Not.

Authors:  Melissa Davis; Rachel Stevenson; Emily Ford; Marisa Erasmus; Stacy M S Zuelly
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.