Literature DB >> 9693396

The comparative trial of TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by lactating women.

J H Chen1, S C Wu, W Q Shao, M H Zou, J Hu, L Cong, L Miao, C Wang, J Dong, J Gao, B L Xiao.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to compare the efficacy, acceptability, safety, and bleeding pattern of TCu 380A intrauterine device (IUD) and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by breastfeeding women. The study population included 97 breastfeeding women using IUD and 100 women using vaginal ring. Of the IUD users, no insertion failure, perforation, or accidental pregnancy occurred in 12 months. There was one IUD expulsion. There were no discontinuations of IUD due to medical reasons other than expulsion. The total discontinuation rate was 2.3%. In the ring group, no accidental pregnancy occurred. The major reasons for discontinuation were ring use-related problems and vaginal problems. The total discontinuation rate was 65.4% within 1 year. The frequency of any one complaint among the ring users was higher than that among the IUD users. There were no differences in the proportion of women having no sexual activity and in the weight of their babies between the two groups. Compared with the IUD users, the median number of bleeding/spotting (B/S) episodes and B/S days of the vaginal ring users were fewer; consequently, the mean length of B/S-free interval was longer in all four reference periods; the mean length of B/S episode and segment were the same; the occurrence of amenorrhea was more frequent; in contrast, the proportions of normal bleeding patterns were fewer. The frequencies of prolonged bleeding, frequent bleeding, and infrequent bleeding patterns did not differ between the two groups. The percentage of irregular bleeding was fewer only in the first two reference periods. It is concluded that the TCu 380A IUD and progesterone-releasing vaginal ring used by breastfeeding women are safe and effective. The higher discontinuation rate of the ring users was mainly because of use-related problems. Breastfeeding women with TCu 380A IUD had better tolerance and acceptability. The TCu 380A IUD does not, but the progesterone-releasing vaginal ring does, suppress the recovery of ovarian function. However, once return of menstruation occurred, there were no differences in bleeding patterns between the two contraceptive methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asia; Biology; Breast Feeding; China; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods; Developing Countries; Diseases; Eastern Asia; Family Planning; Health; Infant Nutrition; Iud; Iud, Copper Releasing; Lactation; Maternal Physiology; Menstruation Disorders; Nutrition; Physiology; Postpartum Women; Puerperium; Reproduction; Research Methodology; Research Report; Vaginal Rings

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9693396     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00043-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  4 in total

1.  Progesterone vaginal ring as a new contraceptive option for lactating mothers: Evidence from a multicenter non-randomized comparative clinical trial in India.

Authors:  Malabika Roy; Avishek Hazra; Ruth Merkatz; Marlena Plagianos; Mohcine Alami; L N Gaur; Kumudha Aruldas; Heather Sussman; Bruce Variano; Regine Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Vaginal ring acceptability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vaginal ring experiences from around the world.

Authors:  Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Kevin Smith; Kristine Torjesen; Ariane van der Straten; Sharon L Achilles; Jennifer B Griffin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2021-10-10       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Vaginal ring acceptability and related preferences among women in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Jennifer B Griffin; Kathleen Ridgeway; Elizabeth Montgomery; Kristine Torjesen; Rachel Clark; Jill Peterson; Rachel Baggaley; Ariane van der Straten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.