Literature DB >> 9692610

Salivary diagnosis of rubella: a study of notified cases in the United Kingdom, 1991-4.

M E Ramsay1, R Brugha, D W Brown, B J Cohen, E Miller.   

Abstract

Rubella infections, notified by general practitioners on the basis of a clinical diagnosis, were investigated by testing blood and saliva samples for specific IgM. Overall 52 (29%) of 178 cases with appropriately timed blood specimens were confirmed as recent rubella by IgM serology. Only 2 (3%) of 74 cases in children under 5 years were confirmed compared to 50 (48%) of 104 cases in older children and adults. The confirmation rate was lower (6%) in those with documented vaccination history than in those without (42%). The specificity of saliva rubella IgM testing compared to testing corresponding blood samples was 99%. The overall sensitivity of saliva rubella IgM testing was 81%. This rose to 90% if results from inappropriately timed specimens and specimens taking more than 1 week to reach the laboratory were excluded. A corresponding saliva rubella IgG test was 98% sensitive and 100% specific. Of 126 rubella IgM negative cases, 25 (20%) were positive for parvovirus B19 IgM. This study confirmed that rubella surveillance based on clinical reports is not specific. It also demonstrated that saliva samples, if taken 7-42 days after onset of illness and transported rapidly to the laboratory, are a feasible alternative to blood samples for rubella surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9692610      PMCID: PMC2809409          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268898008838

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  7 in total

1.  Unseen blindness, unheard deafness, and unrecorded death and disability: congenital rubella in Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  J E Lawn; S Reef; B Baffoe-Bonnie; S Adadevoh; E O Caul; G E Griffin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Detection of low-avidity immunoglobulin G in oral fluid samples: new approach for rubella diagnosis and surveillance.

Authors:  D Akingbade; B J Cohen; D W G Brown
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-01

3.  Causes of morbilliform rash in a highly immunised English population.

Authors:  M Ramsay; M Reacher; C O'Flynn; R Buttery; F Hadden; B Cohen; W Knowles; T Wreghitt; D Brown
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Confirmation of rubella within 4 days of rash onset: comparison of rubella virus RNA detection in oral fluid with immunoglobulin M detection in serum or oral fluid.

Authors:  Emily Abernathy; Cesar Cabezas; Hong Sun; Qi Zheng; Min-hsin Chen; Carlos Castillo-Solorzano; Ana Cecilia Ortiz; Fernando Osores; Lucia Oliveira; Alvaro Whittembury; Jon K Andrus; Rita F Helfand; Joseph Icenogle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Application of Oral Fluid Assays in Support of Mumps, Rubella and Varicella Control Programs.

Authors:  Peter A C Maple
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-09

6.  Detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin G in saliva by an amplification-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibody to fluorescein isothiocyanate.

Authors:  A J Vyse; D W Brown; B J Cohen; R Samuel; D J Nokes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Oral fluid testing during 10 years of rubella elimination, England and Wales.

Authors:  Gayatri Manikkavasagan; Antoaneta Bukasa; Kevin E Brown; Bernard J Cohen; Mary E Ramsay
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.