Literature DB >> 9692564

Postoperative weight gain after standard Whipple's procedure versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: the influence of tumour status.

M I van Berge Henegouwen1, T M Moojen, T M van Gulik, E A Rauws, H Obertop, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest a better postoperative weight gain after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) compared with standard pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). Factors that could also influence postoperative weight gain, such as tumour-positive resection margins and tumour recurrence, have not been taken into account in these studies. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate weight gain in the first 15 months after PD or PPPD and to investigate the influence of other tumour-related factors.
METHODS: From 1991 to 1995, 140 patients underwent subtotal pancreatoduodenectomy; 125 patients underwent resection for malignant disease of the pancreatic head region (56 had PD and 69 PPPD). Patients' weights were evaluated in the pre-illness phase, before operation and during four postoperative phases (at 3, 7, 11 and 15 months). Weight was calculated as a percentage of the pre-illness weight. Patients were subdivided according to tumour status: PD with positive and PD with negative tumour status; PPPD with positive and PPPD with negative tumour status. Tumour-positive status was defined as either microscopically tumour-positive resection margins or radiologically or cytologically proven tumour recurrence within 2 years of surgery.
RESULTS: Five patients died during the hospital stay (PD, four; PPPD, one) (overall mortality rate 4 per cent). There was no difference in overall weight gain between patients having PD and PPPD. There was, however, a difference in patients with positive and negative tumour status for PD (P = 0.0003) and PPPD (P< 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: There is only a minimal difference in postoperative weight gain between patients having PD and PPPD. Differences in postoperative weight gain are related more to positive resection margins and tumour recurrence than to the type of resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9692564     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00745.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  15 in total

1.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  The evaluation of duct-to-mucosal pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hironobu Onishi; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Manabu Kawai; Masaki Ueno; Takashi Hama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prospectively randomized trial using perioperative low-dose octreotide to prevent organ-related and general complications after pancreatic surgery and pancreatico-jejunostomy.

Authors:  Uwe J Hesse; Christophe DeDecker; Philippe Houtmeyers; Pieter Demetter; Wim Ceelen; Piet Pattyn; Roberto Troisi; Bernard deHemptinne
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Christina Heukaufer; Gerd Antes; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Manabu Kawai; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of a change in gastric emptying and nutritional status after a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: comparison between an antecolic and a vertical retrocolic duodenojejunostomy.

Authors:  Naoya Imamura; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Jiro Ohuchida; Masahide Hiyoshi; Motoaki Nagano; Kazuhiro Otani; Kazuhiro Kondo
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Christina Fitzmaurice; Guido Schwarzer; Christoph M Seiler; Gerd Antes; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-16

Review 8.  [Survival, mortality and quality of life after pylorus-preserving or classical Whipple operation. A systematic review with meta-analysis].

Authors:  C Fitzmaurice; C M Seiler; M W Büchler; M K Diener
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 9.  Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christina Fitzmaurice; Guido Schwarzer; Christoph M Seiler; Felix J Hüttner; Gerd Antes; Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-11

10.  Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Masaji Tani; Manabu Kawai; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Yoichi Fujita; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.