Literature DB >> 9692419

Development and validation of the Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire.

D L Lamping1, P Rowe, A Clarke, N Black, L Lessof.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the acceptability, reliability and validity of a short, patient-based questionnaire for assessing the outcomes of surgical treatment for menorrhagia due to benign disease.
DESIGN: A psychometric study by postal survey.
SETTING: Five hospitals in southeast England. SAMPLE: One hundred and eleven women undergoing hysterectomy for menorrhagia due to benign disease.
METHODS: Data from a long research questionnaire used in the North West Thames Hysterectomy Study were analysed using standard psychometric methods to identify the subset of items which were the most scientifically sound indicators of outcome. The Menorrhagia Outcomes questionnaire is a 26-item questionnaire which covers symptoms, post-operative complications, quality of life, and women's satisfaction with outcome. The questionnaire was field tested for acceptability, reliability and validity by postal survey.
RESULTS: The Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire was found to be highly acceptable to women and showed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion and construct validity.
CONCLUSION: The Menorrhagia Outcomes Questionnaire is a practical and scientifically sound measure of outcome from the woman's perspective following surgical treatment for menorrhagia due to benign disease. It takes less than five minutes to complete, is appropriate for use with different surgical treatments for menorrhagia (eg. hysterectomy, endometrial resection, laser ablation) and is feasible for routine monitoring of large numbers of women by postal survey. Most importantly, this questionnaire has been shown to perform well from a scientific point view, having met standard psychometric criteria for reliability and validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9692419     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10209.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  7 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances. Gynaecology.

Authors:  C Kelleher; P Braude
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-11

Review 2.  Outcome measures for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Stephen D Quinn; Jenny Higham
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  The Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire: an instrument for assessing patient-reported outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Martha Dorfer; Karl Tamussino; Andrea Frudinger; Petra Kern; Raimund Winter; Elfriede Greimel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-02-17

4.  The menstrual bleeding questionnaire: development and validation of a comprehensive patient-reported outcome instrument for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  K A Matteson; D M Scott; C A Raker; M A Clark
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Evaluation of indications for and outcomes of elective surgery.

Authors:  Charles J Wright; G Keith Chambers; Yoel Robens-Paradise
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  A systematic review of methods to measure menstrual blood loss.

Authors:  Julia L Magnay; Shaughn O'Brien; Christoph Gerlinger; Christian Seitz
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.