Literature DB >> 9690621

Differential cell cycle checkpoint response in normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts.

P M Flatt1, J O Price, A Shaw, J A Pietenpol.   

Abstract

The incidence of DNA mutation and subsequent risk of transformation in different cell types may depend on cell type-specific variation in position and duration of cell cycle arrest after exposure to DNA-damaging agents. To determine whether cell type-specific checkpoints occur, normal human epidermal keratinocytes (HKs) and human dermal fibroblasts (HFs), isolated from the same tissue, were exposed to genotoxic agents. Following exposure, cell cycle arrest profiles, cell proliferation rates, and select protein levels and activities were analyzed and found to be cell type dependent. After exposure to either gamma-radiation or Adriamycin, HFs arrested primarily in G1, whereas HKs arrested predominantly in G2. The attenuated G1 arrest in the HKs correlated with less p53 protein accumulation, as compared to that observed in G1-arrested HFs. Although gamma-irradiated HFs were unable to reenter the cell cycle, HKs began proliferating 72 h posttreatment. Consistent with the cell cycle profiles observed, cyclin-dependent kinase activities were inhibited for a longer duration in HFs as compared to HKs after gamma-irradiation. The results indicate that cell cycle checkpoint response to genotoxic insult may vary according to cell type within any given tissue. The attenuated G1 arrest observed in HKs may be an important factor in the transforming events leading to skin neoplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9690621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Growth Differ        ISSN: 1044-9523


  14 in total

1.  p53 regulation of G(2) checkpoint is retinoblastoma protein dependent.

Authors:  P M Flatt; L J Tang; C D Scatena; S T Szak; J A Pietenpol
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation-based screen to identify functional genomic binding sites for sequence-specific transactivators.

Authors:  Jamie M Hearnes; Deborah J Mays; Kristy L Schavolt; Luojia Tang; Xin Jiang; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The DNA binding activity of p53 displays reaction-diffusion kinetics.

Authors:  Peter Hinow; Carl E Rogers; Christopher E Barbieri; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Anne K Kenworthy; Emmanuele DiBenedetto
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Electrical stimulation enhances epidermal proliferation in human cutaneous wounds by modulating p53-SIVA1 interaction.

Authors:  Anil Sebastian; Syed A Iqbal; James Colthurst; Susan W Volk; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 8.551

5.  Gene expression pattern of insect fat body cells from in vitro challenge to cell line establishment.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Qian Meng; Ping Tang; Xuan Li; Wei Zhu; Guiling Zhou; Ruihao Shu; Jihong Zhang; Qilian Qin
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Modeling radiation-induced cell cycle delays.

Authors:  Anna Ochab-Marcinek; Ewa Gudowska-Nowak; Elena Nasonova; Sylvia Ritter
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  The Delta Np63 alpha phosphoprotein binds the p21 and 14-3-3 sigma promoters in vivo and has transcriptional repressor activity that is reduced by Hay-Wells syndrome-derived mutations.

Authors:  Matthew D Westfall; Deborah J Mays; Joseph C Sniezek; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Apigenin-induced prostate cancer cell death is initiated by reactive oxygen species and p53 activation.

Authors:  Sanjeev Shukla; Sanjay Gupta
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 7.376

9.  ISG20L1 is a p53 family target gene that modulates genotoxic stress-induced autophagy.

Authors:  Kathryn G Eby; Jennifer M Rosenbluth; Deborah J Mays; Clayton B Marshall; Christopher E Barton; Seema Sinha; Kimberly N Johnson; Luojia Tang; Jennifer A Pietenpol
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Fibroblasts protect melanoma cells from the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin.

Authors:  Manoela Tiago; Edson Mendes de Oliveira; Carla Abdo Brohem; Paula Comune Pennacchi; Rafael Duarte Paes; Raquel Brandão Haga; Ana Campa; Silvia Berlanga de Moraes Barros; Keiran S Smalley; Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.