W L Straus1, S A Qazi, Z Kundi, N K Nomani, B Schwartz. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, USA. walter_straus@merck.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Co-trimoxazole is widely used in treatment of paediatric pneumonia in developing countries, but drug resistance may decrease its effectiveness. We studied the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole compared with that of amoxycillin in pneumonia therapy, and assessed the clinical impact of co-trimoxazole resistance. METHODS: We recruited 595 children, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe or severe pneumonia (WHO criteria) diagnosed in the outpatient wards of two urban Pakistan hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis co-trimoxazole (n=398) or amoxycillin (n=197) in standard WHO doses and dosing schedules, and were monitored in study wards. The primary outcome was inpatient therapy failure (clinical criteria) or clinical evidence of pneumonia at outpatient follow-up examination. FINDINGS: There were 92 (23%) therapy failures in the co-trimoxazole group and 30 (15%) in the amoxycillin group (p=0.03)-26 (13%) versus 12 (12%) among children with non-severe pneumonia (p=0.856) and 66 (33%) versus 18 (18%) among those with severe pneumonia (p=0.009). For patients with severe pneumonia, age under 1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predicted therapy failure. There was no significant association between antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacteraemic children treated with co-trimoxazole. INTERPRETATION:Co-trimoxazole provided effective therapy in non-severe pneumonia. For severe, life-threatening pneumonia, however, co-trimoxazole is less likely than amoxycillin to be effective.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Co-trimoxazole is widely used in treatment of paediatric pneumonia in developing countries, but drug resistance may decrease its effectiveness. We studied the effectiveness of co-trimoxazole compared with that of amoxycillin in pneumonia therapy, and assessed the clinical impact of co-trimoxazole resistance. METHODS: We recruited 595 children, aged 2-59 months, with non-severe or severe pneumonia (WHO criteria) diagnosed in the outpatient wards of two urban Pakistan hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned on a 2:1 basis co-trimoxazole (n=398) or amoxycillin (n=197) in standard WHO doses and dosing schedules, and were monitored in study wards. The primary outcome was inpatient therapy failure (clinical criteria) or clinical evidence of pneumonia at outpatient follow-up examination. FINDINGS: There were 92 (23%) therapy failures in the co-trimoxazole group and 30 (15%) in the amoxycillin group (p=0.03)-26 (13%) versus 12 (12%) among children with non-severe pneumonia (p=0.856) and 66 (33%) versus 18 (18%) among those with severe pneumonia (p=0.009). For patients with severe pneumonia, age under 1 year (p=0.056) and positive chest radiographs (p=0.005) also predicted therapy failure. There was no significant association between antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration and outcome among bacteraemic children treated with co-trimoxazole. INTERPRETATION:Co-trimoxazole provided effective therapy in non-severe pneumonia. For severe, life-threatening pneumonia, however, co-trimoxazole is less likely than amoxycillin to be effective.
Authors: J Anthony G Scott; W Abdullah Brooks; J S Malik Peiris; Douglas Holtzman; E Kim Mulholland Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Evropi Theodoratou; Sarah Al-Jilaihawi; Felicity Woodward; Joy Ferguson; Arnoupe Jhass; Manuela Balliet; Ivana Kolcic; Salim Sadruddin; Trevor Duke; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Samir K Saha; Abdullah H Baqui; Gary L Darmstadt; M Ruhulamin; Mohammed Hanif; Shams El Arifeen; Mathuram Santosham; Kazunori Oishi; Tsuyoshi Nagatake; Robert E Black Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.948