Literature DB >> 9688298

Survival of women with breast cancer in Europe: variation with age, year of diagnosis and country. The EUROCARE Working Group.

M Sant1, R Capocaccia, A Verdecchia, J Estève, G Gatta, A Micheli, M P Coleman, F Berrino.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women in developed countries. Prognosis is better than for other major cancers, and an improvement in survival has been reported for several populations in recent decades. Within the framework of EUROCARE, a population-based project concerned with the survival and care of cancer patients in Europe, we analysed data from 119,139 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1978 and 1985 in 12 countries and followed for at least 6 years. Multiple regression models of relative survival, which take mortality from all other causes in each area into account, were used to estimate the effect of age, period of diagnosis and country on survival. For the comparison between countries, survival rates were age-standardised to the age structure of the entire study population. Women aged 40-49 years at diagnosis had the best prognosis in all countries and throughout the study period. Women younger than 30 years at diagnosis had a worse prognosis than those aged 30-39. The highest relative survival at 5 years was in Finland and Switzerland (about 74%), intermediate levels were found for Italy, France, The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany (about 70%) and the lowest rates were in Spain, the United Kingdom, Estonia and Poland (55-64%). During the 6 months following diagnosis, survival was highly dependent on age and was sharply lower in women older than 49 years. For women surviving more than 6 months after diagnosis, survival was similar for all ages, although women aged 40-49 still had the better prognosis. The average rate of death from breast cancer fell by about 2.5% for each year of diagnosis between 1978 and 1985. This improvement manifested mainly in younger and older women, for whom survival was initially less good. The largest improvement was seen in Poland (-15% death risk per year). We suggest that the better survival of women aged 40-49 at diagnosis is related to lower levels of circulating sex hormones, resulting in reduced stimulation of tumour cell growth. Early diagnosis may also be important in the peri-menopausal period due to increased diagnostic attention. Low survival in the United Kingdom may be due to inadequate adherence to consensus treatment guidelines and greater variation in treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9688298     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980831)77:5<679::aid-ijc3>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  22 in total

1.  Cancer survival in Britain. Cancer chemotherapy costs money.

Authors:  P G de Takats
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-12-11

2.  [Indicator analysis of prostate cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society 2015].

Authors:  J Fichtner; C Kowalski; S Wesselmann; P Albers
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Female breast cancer in Gipuzkoa: prognostic factors and survival.

Authors:  N Larrañaga; C Sarasqueta; P Martínez-Camblor; M J Mitxelena; A Mendiola; I Martínez-Pueyo; M Basterretxea
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Redesigning cancer care.

Authors:  David Kerr; Helen Bevan; Ben Gowland; Jean Penny; Don Berwick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-01-19

5.  Survival after acute lymphocytic leukaemia: effects of socioeconomic status and geographic region.

Authors:  J A Schillinger; P C Grosclaude; S Honjo; M J Quinn; A Sloggett; M P Coleman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Is there a clinical benefit from prostate cancer center certification? An evaluation of functional and oncologic outcomes from 22,649 radical prostatectomy patients.

Authors:  Marius Cristian Butea-Bocu; Guido Müller; Daniel Pucheril; Eckhard Kröger; Ullrich Otto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Investigational chemotherapy and novel pharmacokinetic mechanisms for the treatment of breast cancer brain metastases.

Authors:  Neal Shah; Afroz S Mohammad; Pushkar Saralkar; Samuel A Sprowls; Schuyler D Vickers; Devin John; Rachel M Tallman; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Katherine E Jarrell; Mark Pinti; Richard L Nolan; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 7.658

8.  Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment.

Authors:  Hanna Fredholm; Sonja Eaker; Jan Frisell; Lars Holmberg; Irma Fredriksson; Henrik Lindman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using service guidance to shape the delivery of cancer services: experience in the UK.

Authors:  R A Haward
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  p53 mutation, deprivation and poor prognosis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  L Baker; P R Quinlan; N Patten; A Ashfield; L-J Birse-Stewart-Bell; C McCowan; J-C Bourdon; C A Purdie; L B Jordan; J A Dewar; L Wu; A M Thompson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.