BACKGROUND: TrkA, the high affinity, tyrosine kinase receptor for nerve growth factor (NGF) has been implicated as an oncogene in several neoplasms. In prostate cancer, inhibitors of the NGF/TrkA signal pathway results in tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, inhibition of this trk pathway in the normal prostate produces no effect. One explanation for this difference between normal and malignant prostate is that TrkA is mutated in prostate cancer, changing its function. To test this possibility human primary prostate cancers were screened for evidence of mutations in the TrkA gene to identify how this gene might be activated in prostate cancer. METHODS: Single-strand conformation polymorphism was used to screen genomic DNA, isolated from 42 human primary prostate cancers. In samples in which an aberrant banding pattern was identified, the screen was repeated using both the tumor DNA and DNA isolated from normal tissue of the same patients. Genetic changes were confirmed by direct sequencing of the aberrantly migrating bands. RESULTS: Although somatic mutations were not identified in any of the exons screened, four polymorphisms were detected in three different exons. Some of these polymorphisms occurred in the majority of the patients screened, but their frequencies were similar when compared with DNA isolated from a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic mutations of TrkA do not seem to play a significant role in activation of this pathway in prostate cancer. However, the absence of mutations in otherwise genetically unstable prostate tumor DNA suggests that intact NGF/TrkA pathways may be important in prostate cancer development.
BACKGROUND:TrkA, the high affinity, tyrosine kinase receptor for nerve growth factor (NGF) has been implicated as an oncogene in several neoplasms. In prostate cancer, inhibitors of the NGF/TrkA signal pathway results in tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, inhibition of this trk pathway in the normal prostate produces no effect. One explanation for this difference between normal and malignant prostate is that TrkA is mutated in prostate cancer, changing its function. To test this possibility humanprimary prostate cancers were screened for evidence of mutations in the TrkA gene to identify how this gene might be activated in prostate cancer. METHODS: Single-strand conformation polymorphism was used to screen genomic DNA, isolated from 42 humanprimary prostate cancers. In samples in which an aberrant banding pattern was identified, the screen was repeated using both the tumor DNA and DNA isolated from normal tissue of the same patients. Genetic changes were confirmed by direct sequencing of the aberrantly migrating bands. RESULTS: Although somatic mutations were not identified in any of the exons screened, four polymorphisms were detected in three different exons. Some of these polymorphisms occurred in the majority of the patients screened, but their frequencies were similar when compared with DNA isolated from a control group. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic mutations of TrkA do not seem to play a significant role in activation of this pathway in prostate cancer. However, the absence of mutations in otherwise genetically unstable prostate tumor DNA suggests that intact NGF/TrkA pathways may be important in prostate cancer development.
Authors: Jamie L Croucher; Radhika Iyer; Nanxin Li; Valentina Molteni; Jon Loren; W Perry Gordon; Tove Tuntland; Bo Liu; Garrett M Brodeur Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Radhika Iyer; Carly R Varela; Jane E Minturn; Ruth Ho; Anisha M Simpson; Jennifer E Light; Audrey E Evans; Huaqing Zhao; Kenneth Thress; Jeffrey L Brown; Garrett M Brodeur Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: John L Marshall; Hedy Kindler; John Deeken; Pankaj Bhargava; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Naiyer Rizvi; Taina Luhtala; Stacy Boylan; Margaret Dordal; Philmore Robertson; Michael J Hawkins; Mark J Ratain Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Tiziana Negri; Elena Tamborini; Gian Paolo Dagrada; Angela Greco; Samantha Staurengo; Marco Guzzo; Laura D Locati; Antonino Carbone; Marco A Pierotti; Lisa Licitra; Silvana Pilotti Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Garrett M Brodeur; Jane E Minturn; Ruth Ho; Anisha M Simpson; Radhika Iyer; Carly R Varela; Jennifer E Light; Venkatadri Kolla; Audrey E Evans Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ramesh Singh; Dileep Karri; Hong Shen; Jiangyong Shao; Subhamoy Dasgupta; Shixia Huang; Dean P Edwards; Michael M Ittmann; Bert W O'Malley; Ping Yi Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Beata S Lipska; Elzbieta Drozynska; Paola Scaruffi; Gian Paolo Tonini; Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska; Szymon Zietkiewicz; Anna Balcerska; Danuta Perek; Alicja Chybicka; Wojciech Biernat; Janusz Limon Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-12-13 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Marzia Di Donato; Giovanni Galasso; Pia Giovannelli; Antonio A Sinisi; Antimo Migliaccio; Gabriella Castoria Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2021-06-29