Literature DB >> 9687379

Y-688, a new quinolone active against quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: lack of in vivo efficacy in experimental endocarditis.

J M Entenza1, O Marchetti, M P Glauser, P Moreillon.   

Abstract

Y-688 is a new fluoroquinolone with increased activity against ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci. The MICs of Y-688 and other quinolones were determined for 58 isolates of ciprofloxacin-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The MICs at which 50% and 90% of bacteria were inhibited were >/=128 and >/=128 mg/liter, respectively, for ciprofloxacin, 16 and 32 mg/liter, respectively, for sparfloxacin, and 0.25 and 1 mg/liter, respectively, for Y-688. This new quinolone was further tested in rats with experimental endocarditis due to either of two isolates of ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA (namely, P8/128 and CR1). Infected animals were treated for 3 days with ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, or Y-688. Antibiotics were administered through a computerized pump to simulate human-like pharmacokinetics in the serum of rats. The anticipated peak and trough levels of Y-688 were 4 and 1 mg/liter at 0.5 and 12 h, respectively. Treatment with ciprofloxacin was ineffective. Vancomycin significantly decreased vegetation bacterial counts for both organisms (P less, similar 0.05). In contrast, Y-688 only marginally decreased vegetation bacterial counts (P greater, similar 0.05). Moreover, several vegetation that failed Y-688 treatment grew staphylococci for which the MICs of the test antibiotic were increased two to eight times. Y-688 also selected for resistance in vitro, and isolates for which the MICs were increased eight times emerged at a frequency of ca. 10(-8). Thus, in spite of its low MIC for ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA, Y-688 failed in vivo and its use carried the risk of resistance selection. The fact that ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci became rapidly resistant to this potent new drug suggests that the treatment of ciprofloxacin-resistant MRSA with new quinolones might be more problematic than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9687379      PMCID: PMC105705     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  23 in total

1.  Levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, or vancomycin for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible or -resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Entenza; J Vouillamoz; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Importance of genotypic and phenotypic tolerance in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Streptococcus gordonii.

Authors:  J M Entenza; I Caldelari; M P Glauser; P Francioli; P Moreillon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Natural history of aortic valve endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  E Héraïef; M P Glauser; L R Freedman
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  In-vitro activity of four new fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  J A García-Rodríguez; J E García Sánchez; M I García García; M J Fresnadillo; I Trujillano; E García Sánchez
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Ciprofloxacin, a quinolone carboxylic acid compound active against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  N X Chin; H C Neu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Parenteral sparfloxacin compared with ceftriaxone in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to penicillin-susceptible and -resistant streptococci.

Authors:  J M Entenza; M Blatter; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in normal and morbidly obese subjects.

Authors:  R A Blouin; L A Bauer; D D Miller; K E Record; W O Griffen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Fluoroquinolone resistance in staphylococci: new challenges.

Authors:  C C Sanders; W E Sanders; K S Thomson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Antibiotic treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  J M Entenza; U Fluckiger; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Mechanisms of 4-quinolone resistance in quinolone-resistant and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Japan and China.

Authors:  M Tanaka; Y X Zhang; H Ishida; T Akasaka; K Sato; I Hayakawa
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  4 in total

1.  Topoisomerase sequences of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin or trovafloxacin.

Authors:  D T Dubin; J E Fitzgibbon; M D Nahvi; J F John
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Quinupristin-dalfopristin combined with beta-lactams for treatment of experimental endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus constitutively resistant to macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B antibiotics.

Authors:  J Vouillamoz; J M Entenza; C Féger; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Efficacies of moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin against experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing various degrees of ciprofloxacin resistance.

Authors:  J M Entenza; Y A Que; J Vouillamoz; M P Glauser; P Moreillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  MC21-A, a bactericidal antibiotic produced by a new marine bacterium, Pseudoalteromonas phenolica sp. nov. O-BC30(T), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Alim Isnansetyo; Yuto Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.