AIMS: To assess the value of opportunistic screening in Accident and Emergency (A&E) for patients with alcohol-related problems and provision of an intervention. DESIGN: Screening of A&E attendees for the purpose of recruitment to a randomized trial of a counselling intervention. SETTING: A General Hospital A&E department. PARTICIPANTS: All 17,000 adult A&E attendees, during a 6-month period and all nursing staff working within the department. MEASUREMENTS: Patients' self-reported alcohol consumption, responses to the CAGE questionnaire (four questions designed to identify problem drinking) and proportions offered, and taking up offer of help. FINDINGS: Only 4663 (28%) adult attendees at A&E were actually screened and of these 2% declined and 25% were judged unable to answer. Of the rest, 86% drank alcohol, with 22% drinking in excess of current guidelines or with two or more positive answers to CAGE. Only 41% (264) of those drinking to excess were offered help and 88% of these declined it. This left 13 patients to be included in the trial. CONCLUSION: There is a significant need for an effective intervention in this area but considerable barriers exist to testing the efficacy of potential screening strategies and interventions.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the value of opportunistic screening in Accident and Emergency (A&E) for patients with alcohol-related problems and provision of an intervention. DESIGN: Screening of A&E attendees for the purpose of recruitment to a randomized trial of a counselling intervention. SETTING: A General Hospital A&E department. PARTICIPANTS: All 17,000 adult A&E attendees, during a 6-month period and all nursing staff working within the department. MEASUREMENTS: Patients' self-reported alcohol consumption, responses to the CAGE questionnaire (four questions designed to identify problem drinking) and proportions offered, and taking up offer of help. FINDINGS: Only 4663 (28%) adult attendees at A&E were actually screened and of these 2% declined and 25% were judged unable to answer. Of the rest, 86% drank alcohol, with 22% drinking in excess of current guidelines or with two or more positive answers to CAGE. Only 41% (264) of those drinking to excess were offered help and 88% of these declined it. This left 13 patients to be included in the trial. CONCLUSION: There is a significant need for an effective intervention in this area but considerable barriers exist to testing the efficacy of potential screening strategies and interventions.
Authors: Brianna J Turner; Barbara S McCann; Christopher W Dunn; Doyanne A Darnell; Christopher R Beam; Blair Kleiber; Kimberly M Nelson; Rena Fukunaga Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2017-05-20
Authors: Emmert Roberts; Rachel Morse; Sophie Epstein; Matthew Hotopf; David Leon; Colin Drummond Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Colin Drummond; Paolo Deluca; Simon Coulton; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Mike Crawford; Veronica Dale; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Ruth McGovern; Judy Myles; Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Robert Patton; Katherine Perryman; Tom Phillips; Jonathan Shepherd; Robin Touquet; Eileen Kaner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 3.240