BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated sucralfate, well-known in the treatment of gastric ulcers, in relation to its possible reduction of radiation-induced acute complications in the treatment of head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS:One hundred two patients were randomized in a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective setting. All patients were treated to a minimum dose of 55 Gy in 5 weeks. Oral intake of sucralfate was started at the beginning of radiotherapy and continued during the whole treatment at a dose of 1 g six times a day. All patients were scored according to a scoring system developed in our department. Weight was checked once a week. RESULTS: Comparing the time course of the mean scores for subjective intolerance, mucositis, dysphagia, dermatitis and nausea, no statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms (sucralfate, n = 38; placebo, n = 45) were observed. The mean weight loss in the sucralfate arm was 1.6 +/- 3.4 kg while it was 1.3 +/- 2.0 kg in the placebo arm. Apart from gastrointestinal upset, the administration of sucralfate did not cause any side-effects. CONCLUSION: This trial produced no clinical evidence indicating that the oral intake of sucralfate reduces the acute radiation-induced side-effects. Therefore, we do not recommend the prophylactic use of sucralfate in patients with head and neck cancer treated byradiotherapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We evaluated sucralfate, well-known in the treatment of gastric ulcers, in relation to its possible reduction of radiation-induced acute complications in the treatment of head and neck cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two patients were randomized in a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective setting. All patients were treated to a minimum dose of 55 Gy in 5 weeks. Oral intake of sucralfate was started at the beginning of radiotherapy and continued during the whole treatment at a dose of 1 g six times a day. All patients were scored according to a scoring system developed in our department. Weight was checked once a week. RESULTS: Comparing the time course of the mean scores for subjective intolerance, mucositis, dysphagia, dermatitis and nausea, no statistically significant differences between the two treatment arms (sucralfate, n = 38; placebo, n = 45) were observed. The mean weight loss in the sucralfate arm was 1.6 +/- 3.4 kg while it was 1.3 +/- 2.0 kg in the placebo arm. Apart from gastrointestinal upset, the administration of sucralfate did not cause any side-effects. CONCLUSION: This trial produced no clinical evidence indicating that the oral intake of sucralfate reduces the acute radiation-induced side-effects. Therefore, we do not recommend the prophylactic use of sucralfate in patients with head and neck cancer treated by radiotherapy.
Authors: Amanda Bolderston; Nancy S Lloyd; Rebecca K S Wong; Lori Holden; Linda Robb-Blenderman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Helen V Worthington; Jan E Clarkson; Gemma Bryan; Susan Furness; Anne-Marie Glenny; Anne Littlewood; Martin G McCabe; Stefan Meyer; Tasneem Khalid Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-04-13
Authors: Rebecca K S Wong; René-Jean Bensadoun; Christine B Boers-Doets; Jane Bryce; Alexandre Chan; Joel B Epstein; Beth Eaby-Sandy; Mario E Lacouture Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah P Saunders; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Justin Allemano; Paolo Bossi; Marianne D van de Wetering; Nikhil G Rao; Carin Potting; Karis K Cheng; Annette Freidank; Michael T Brennan; Joanne Bowen; Kristopher Dennis; Rajesh V Lalla Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Deborah P Saunders; Tanya Rouleau; Karis Cheng; Noam Yarom; Abhishek Kandwal; Jamie Joy; Kivanc Bektas Kayhan; Marianne van de Wetering; Norman Brito-Dellan; Tomoko Kataoka; Karen Chiang; Vinisha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Joel Epstein; Rajesh V Lalla; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: V Kouloulias; C Asimakopoulos; M Tolia; G Filippou; K Platoni; M Dilvoi; I Beli; J Georgakopoulos; G Patatoukas; N Kelekis Journal: Hippokratia Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 0.471