Literature DB >> 9683333

Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: prediction from multiple frequency segmental bioimpedance analysis.

A Pietrobelli1, P Morini, N Battistini, G Chiumello, C Nuñez, S B Heymsfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Bioimpedance analysis (BIA) methods have potential to predict appendicular skeletal muscle mass (SM), although available 50 kHz prediction models include, in addition to impedance (Z), an independent age term. An age term in models is undesirable as it reflects incomplete understanding of underlying conduction physiology. This study tested the hypothesis, based on fluid distribution models related to aging, that appendicular SM bioimpedance analysis (BIA) prediction models would no longer include an independent age term, after first controlling for stature-adjusted appendicular impedance (height2/Z), at injected frequencies greater than 50 kHz.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional evaluation of adults who had segmental Z and phase angle (phi) measured with multiple frequency BIA, and arm and leg SM with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Skeletal muscle prediction models were developed with appendicular SM as dependent variable and height2/Z, gender, age and phi as potential independent variables.
RESULTS: Examination of hypothesis in 49 subjects indicated: both arm and leg SM were highly correlated with height2/segmental Z at frequencies ranging from 1-300 kHz; gender was significant covariate in prediction models only at 1 kHz; age remained a significant covariate after controlling for height2/segmental Z at all frequencies; phi did not add significantly to models; and SM prediction models gave maximum R2 at 50 kHz for arm but R2 continued to rise up to 300 kHz for leg.
CONCLUSION: Although multifrequency BIA did not eliminate SM prediction model age term, our findings suggest injected frequencies up to 300 kHz may have advantages for evaluating leg SM over conventional 50 kHz method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9683333     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  13 in total

Review 1.  Establishing body composition in obesity.

Authors:  A Pietrobelli; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Association Between Multi-frequency Phase Angle and Survival in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  David Hui; Rony Dev; Lindsay Pimental; Minjeong Park; Maria A Cerana; Diane Liu; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Reliability and accuracy of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing muscle and fat mass in older Europeans: a comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Katharina Mally; Jens Trentmann; Martin Heller; Manuela Dittmar
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Measuring body composition using the bioelectrical impedance method can predict the outcomes of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with pancreatobiliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Mami Muramatsu; Aya Tsuchiya; Seiko Ohta; Yukie Iijima; Miyuki Maruyama; Yoshiko Onodera; Megumi Hagihara; Naoki Nakaya; Itaru Sato; Kenji Omura; Soichiro Ueno; Hideo Nakajima
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Estimation of maximal oxygen uptake by bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Stahn; Elmarie Terblanche; Sven Grunert; Günther Strobel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Assessment methods in human body composition.

Authors:  Seon Yeong Lee; Dympna Gallagher
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  Active core rewarming avoids bioelectrical impedance changes in postanesthetic patients.

Authors:  Alma Rebeca Gutiérrez-Cruz; Bernardo Soto-Rivera; Bertha Alicia León-Chávez; Ernesto Suaste-Gómez; Daniel Martinez-Fong; Juan Antonio González-Barrios
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Validation of two portable bioelectrical impedance analyses for the assessment of body composition in school age children.

Authors:  Li-Wen Lee; Yu-San Liao; Hsueh-Kuan Lu; Pei-Lin Hsiao; Yu-Yawn Chen; Ching-Chi Chi; Kuen-Chang Hsieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity.

Authors:  Elisabetta Marini; Roberto Buffa; Bruno Saragat; Alessandra Coin; Elena Debora Toffanello; Linda Berton; Enzo Manzato; Giuseppe Sergi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Inter-sport variability of muscle volume distribution identified by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in four ball sports.

Authors:  Yosuke Yamada; Yoshihisa Masuo; Eitaro Nakamura; Shingo Oda
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.