Literature DB >> 9683312

Rationale and design for the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial.

H R Black1, W J Elliott, J D Neaton, G Grandits, P Grambsch, R H Grimm, L Hansson, Y Lacoucière, J Muller, P Sleight, M A Weber, W B White, G Williams, J Wittes, A Zanchetti, T D Fakouhi.   

Abstract

The Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Trial is a randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, two-arm, actively controlled, multicenter, international 5-year clinical trial involving 15,000 patients. CONVINCE will compare the incidence of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), fatal or nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular-disease-related death in two antihypertensive treatment regimens. One treatment arm begins with controlled onset-extended release (COER)-verapamil, which has its major antihypertensive effect 6-12 hours after administration. The other arm (standard of care (SOC)) begins with either hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) or atenolol, one of which is preselected by the investigator for an individual patient prior to randomization. Secondary objectives include comparisons of the regimens for each of the components of the primary endpoint (separately), death or hospitalization related to cardiovascular disease, efficacy in lowering blood pressure to goal, primary events occurring between 6 am and noon, all-cause mortality, withdrawals from blinded therapy, cancer, and hospitalizations due to bleeding. Patients may be enrolled if they are hypertensive and at least 55 years of age and have an established second risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Initial medications include COER-verapamil (180 mg/d), HCTZ (12.5 mg/d), or atenolol (50 mg/d). Initial doses are doubled if blood pressure (BP) does not reach goal (systolic BP < 140 mm and diastolic BP < 90 mm Hg). If BP is not controlled by the higher dose of the initial medication, HCTZ is added to COER-verapamil, or the SOC choice not initially selected is added in the SOC arm. An ACE-inhibitor is recommended (although nearly any open-label medication is allowed) as the third step for patients whose BP is not adequately controlled or who have a contraindication to one of the two SOC medications. Patients take two sets of tablets daily, one in the morning and one in the evening. Although most patients switch from an established antihypertensive medication to randomized treatment, untreated patients with stages I-III hypertension (SBP between 140 and 190 or DBP between 90 and 110 mm Hg) are eligible. Outcomes are monitored by an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Enrollment began during the third quarter of 1996, and follow-up is to be completed in the third quarter of 2002.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9683312     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  15 in total

Review 1.  Renal artery stenosis as a cause of renal impairment: implications for treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J E Scoble
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Failure of magnesium to protect isolated cardiomyocytes from effects of hypoxia or metabolic poisoning.

Authors:  M M Gallagher; A P Allshire
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Lessons learned from prematurely terminated clinical trials.

Authors:  D Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Chronotherapeutics: are there meaningful differences among antihypertensive drugs?

Authors:  L Poirier; J Lefebvre; Y Lacourciere
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Clinical pharmacology-physiology conference. A chrono-therapeutic approach to the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  D T Lowenthal; J Estrada; R Cott
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Chronotherapeutics for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Y A Anwar; W B White
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Beta-blockers for hypertension.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Hazel A Bradley; Jimmy Volmink; Bongani M Mayosi; Lionel H Opie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-20

Review 8.  Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.

Authors:  Jiaying Zhu; Ning Chen; Muke Zhou; Jian Guo; Cairong Zhu; Jie Zhou; Mengmeng Ma; Li He
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-09

Review 9.  Premature termination of clinical trials--lessons learned.

Authors:  D A Sica
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  The role of existing and newer calcium channel blockers in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Jan Basile
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.