Literature DB >> 9682328

Exact tests of equivalence and efficacy with a non-zero lower bound for comparative studies.

I S Chan1.   

Abstract

Exact tests of equivalence and efficacy with a non-zero lower bound based on two independent binomial proportions for comparative trials are proposed. These exact tests are desirable for studies with small sample sizes. They generalize classical methods to include testing of null hypotheses of prespecified differences and can be used to demonstrate a new treatment's efficacy or its equivalence to a standard treatment. The proposed exact tests use unconditional distributions of the test statistics. Variances of test statistics are estimated via a constrained maximum likelihood method (Farrington and Manning). Data from oncology and vaccine clinical trials are used to illustrate the exact tests.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9682328     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980630)17:12<1403::aid-sim834>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Human gene copy number spectra analysis in congenital heart malformations.

Authors:  Aoy Tomita-Mitchell; Donna K Mahnke; Craig A Struble; Maureen E Tuffnell; Karl D Stamm; Mats Hidestrand; Susan E Harris; Mary A Goetsch; Pippa M Simpson; David P Bick; Ulrich Broeckel; Andrew N Pelech; James S Tweddell; Michael E Mitchell
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Factors associated with parental perception of child vulnerability 12 months after abnormal newborn screening results.

Authors:  Audrey Tluczek; Anne Chevalier McKechnie; Roger L Brown
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Ten-year follow-up of human papillomavirus vaccine efficacy against the most stringent cervical neoplasia end-point-registry-based follow-up of three cohorts from randomized trials.

Authors:  Matti Lehtinen; Camilla Lagheden; Tapio Luostarinen; Tiina Eriksson; Dan Apter; Katja Harjula; Marjo Kuortti; Kari Natunen; Johanna Palmroth; Tiina Petäjä; Eero Pukkala; Mari Siitari-Mattila; Frank Struyf; Pekka Nieminen; Jorma Paavonen; Gary Dubin; Joakim Dillner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Immediate versus delayed removal of urinary catheter after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E M Sandberg; Arh Twijnstra; C A van Meir; H S Kok; N van Geloven; K Gludovacz; W Kolkman; Htc Nagel; Lcf Haans; K Kapiteijn; F W Jansen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Incomplete data analysis of non-inferiority clinical trials: Difference between binomial proportions case.

Authors:  Yulia Sidi; Ofer Harel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-05-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.