Literature DB >> 9681901

The health and welfare effects of day-care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

B Zoritch1, I Roberts, A Oakley.   

Abstract

Day-care has long been a controversial aspect of social policy in countries such as the U.K. What evidence is there about the effects of out-of-home day-care on educational, health and welfare outcomes for children and their families? This paper applies to day-care studies, the methodology of the systematic review as pioneered in the health care field, in order to establish the evidence-base for day-care provision. Randomised controlled trials of day-care for pre-school children were identified using electronic databases, hand searches of relevant literature and contacts with authors. A total of 8 trials were identified after examining 920 abstracts and 19 books. All the trials were carried out in the U.S.A. European research on this topic is extensive but we did not identify any studies using trial design. Instead observational, case controlled and cohort studies were prominent. The trials were assessed for methodological quality. Results showed that day-care promotes children's intelligence, development and school achievement. Long-term follow up demonstrates increased employment, lower teenage pregnancy rates, higher socio-economic status and decreased criminal behaviour. There are positive effects on mothers' education, employment and interaction with children. Effects on fathers have not been examined. Few studies look at a range of outcomes spanning the health, education and welfare domains. Most of the trials combined non-parental day-care with some element of parent training or education (mostly targeted at mothers); they did not disentangle the possible effects of these two interventions. The trials had other significant methodological weaknesses, pointing to the importance of improving on study design in this field. There is a need for well designed research on day-care to provide an evidence-base for British social policy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9681901     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00037-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Randomisation and resource allocation: a missed opportunity for evaluating health care and social interventions.

Authors:  T Toroyan; I Roberts; A Oakley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings.

Authors:  Hilary Graham
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Father's occupational group and daily smoking during adolescence: patterns and predictors.

Authors:  Mariël Droomers; Carola T M Schrijvers; Sally Casswell; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Occupational level of the father and alcohol consumption during adolescence; patterns and predictors.

Authors:  M Droomers; C T M Schrijvers; S Casswell; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Systematic review of resilience-enhancing, universal, primary school-based mental health promotion programs.

Authors:  Amanda Fenwick-Smith; Emma E Dahlberg; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2018-07-05

Review 6.  Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies.

Authors:  Angela Harden; Ginny Brunton; Adam Fletcher; Ann Oakley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.