Literature DB >> 9680899

Plaque formation and gingivitis after supervised mouthrinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride, 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and placebo for 6 months.

N P Lang1, J C Hase, M Grassi, C H Hämmerle, C Weigel, E Kelty, F Frutig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, 6-month clinical trial with parallel group design in 162 patients with gingivitis divided into three rinsing groups was conducted in order to study the efficacy and safety of a flavoured solution of delmopinol hydrochloride 2 mg ml-1 (0.2% w/v, Decapinol Mouthwash) used for supervised mouthrinsing in one rinsing group, in comparison with chlorhexidine digluconate 2 mg ml-1 (0.2% w/v, Hibitane Dental) in a second rinsing group, and placebo in the third group. The criteria of the Plaque Index (PI) were used to assess plaque formation. Bleeding on probing (BOP) to the bottom of the pocket with a standard pressure was used as the primary gingivitis assessment. The occurrence of supragingival dental calculus and extrinsic tooth staining were also assessed. In addition, patients were asked to report adverse events at each visit.
RESULTS: Delmopinol and chlorhexidine exhibited lower scores of the mean PI and the BOP percentage than placebo, both at the 3-month and 6-month examinations. Furthermore, both active solutions showed a higher extent of staining of the teeth than placebo during these two observation periods. Rinsing with chlorhexidine resulted in more dental calculus than placebo after 6 months. Chlorhexidine showed lower scores for plaque formation and gingivitis development but higher scores of supragingival dental calculus (after 6 months) and tooth staining than did delmopinol. Both active solutions were reported by the patients--approximately to the same extent but more frequently than placebo--to induce taste alterations and a transient anaesthetic sensation of the oral mucosa. However, subjective staining of the teeth and tongue was reported by 16% of the delmopinol patients, but by 86% of the patients rinsing with chlorhexidine for 6 months. Furthermore, 24% of the patients in the chlorhexidine group, 9% in the delmopinol group and 4% in the placebo group wished to withdraw from treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this clinical trial indicate that supervised rinsing with 0.2% delmopinol hydrochloride or with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate twice daily for 60 s as a supplement to normal mechanical oral hygiene procedures resulted in less plaque formation and gingivitis than rinsing with placebo. Although chlorhexidine was more effective than delmopinol regarding plaque formation and gingivitis, it was considered by the patients as less tolerable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680899     DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.1998.tb00266.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Dis        ISSN: 1354-523X            Impact factor:   3.511


  9 in total

1.  Clinical and microbiological effects of an essential-oil-containing mouth rinse applied in the "one-stage full-mouth disinfection" protocol--a randomized doubled-blinded preliminary study.

Authors:  Sheila Cavalca Cortelli; Fabiana Cavallini; Marcello Faria Regueira Alves; Arnaud Alves Bezerra; Celso Silva Queiroz; José Roberto Cortelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Chlorhexidine mouthrinse as an adjunctive treatment for gingival health.

Authors:  Patrice James; Helen V Worthington; Carmel Parnell; Mairead Harding; Thomas Lamont; Andrea Cheung; Helen Whelton; Philip Riley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-31

3.  Antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Manupati Prasanth
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011

4.  Adjunctive effect of mouthrinse on treatment of peri-implant mucositis using mechanical debridement: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Juliana Philip; Marja L Laine; Daniël Wismeijer
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Adverse events associated with home use of mouthrinses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Santosh Kumar Tadakamadla; Stephen Thaddeus Connelly; Chiarella Sforza; Conchita Martín
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2019-09-23

Review 6.  Current uses of chlorhexidine for management of oral disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Zoë L S Brookes; Raul Bescos; Louise A Belfield; Kamran Ali; Anthony Roberts
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Comparison of the efficacy of three different mouthrinse solutions in decreasing the level of streptococcus mutans in saliva.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Kocak; Suat Ozcan; Sibel Kocak; Ozgur Topuz; Hulya Erten
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-01

8.  The effect of adjunctive chlorhexidine mouthrinse on GCF MMP-8 and TIMP-1 levels in gingivitis: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Oya Türkoğlu; Sema Becerik; Taina Tervahartiala; Timo Sorsa; Gül Atilla; Gülnur Emingil
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The staining effect of different mouthwashes containing nanoparticles on dental enamel.

Authors:  Neda Eslami; Farzaneh Ahrari; Omid Rajabi; Roya Zamani
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.