Literature DB >> 9680721

The subclass approach for mutational spectrum analysis: application of the SEM algorithm.

G B Glazko1, L Milanesi, I B Rogozin.   

Abstract

Analysis and comparison of mutational spectra represents an important problem in molecular biology. To analyse a mutational spectra we apply an algorithm based on the SEM subclass approach (Simulation, Expectation, Maximization). The algorithm tries to classify the mutational sites according to different mutation probabilities, and each site should belong to one class. Each class is approximated by binomial distribution and thus any real mutational spectrum is regarded as a mixture of binomial distributions. The separation process runs iteratively. Each iteration includes the simulation, maximization and estimation procedures. To evaluate the quality of the classification results, the X2 test is used. The algorithm has been checked on random spectra with preset parameters and on real mutational spectra. As has been shown, 17 out of 19 analysed real mutational spectra can be divided into two or more classes of sites, of which one contains hotspots of mutation. For the G:C-->A:T mutational spectra induced by Sn1 alkylating mutagenes (11 spectra) the classification accuracy was 0.95. To test different site volumes, each Sn1-induced spectrum was divided into the G-->A and C-->T spectra. The classification accuracy for these spectra was 0.96. From the analysis of classification errors it is possible to suggest that at least part of them cannot be ascribed to the faults of the algorithm but are caused by some special features of the mutagenesis itself. The results of the real data are in good relation with existing knowledge. The approach we present is an attempt to formalize the concept of a "mutational hotspot". The program implementing the SEM algorithm is available on the Web server (http:/(/)www.itba.mi.cnr.it/webmutation).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680721     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  6 in total

1.  Causes of size homoplasy among chloroplast microsatellites in closely related Clusia species.

Authors:  Marie L Hale; Anne M Borland; Mats H G Gustafsson; Kirsten Wolff
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Basu; Liran Carmel; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Altered spectrum of somatic hypermutation in common variable immunodeficiency disease characteristic of defective repair of mutations.

Authors:  Bhargavi Duvvuri; Venkata R S K Duvvuri; Jörg Grigull; Alberto Martin; Qiang Pan-Hammarström; Gillian E Wu; Mani Larijani
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Oncogenic potential is related to activating effect of cancer single and double somatic mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Kosuke Hashimoto; Igor B Rogozin; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Expression of human AID in yeast induces mutations in context similar to the context of somatic hypermutation at G-C pairs in immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  Vladimir I Mayorov; Igor B Rogozin; Linda R Adkison; Christin Frahm; Thomas A Kunkel; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 3.615

6.  Comparative mutational analyses of influenza A viruses.

Authors:  Peter Pak-Hang Cheung; Igor B Rogozin; Ka-Tim Choy; Hoi Yee Ng; Joseph Sriyal Malik Peiris; Hui-Ling Yen
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 4.942

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.