Literature DB >> 9680679

The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief.

S M Carlson1, L J Moses, H R Hix.   

Abstract

This research examines whether children's difficulties with deception and false belief arise from a lack of inhibitory control rather than from a conceptual deficit. In 3 studies, 3-year-olds deceived frequently under conditions requiring relatively low inhibitory control (e.g., misleading pictorial cues or arrows) but failed to do so under conditions of high inhibitory control (deceptive pointing). Study 2 ruled out that the findings were due to social intimidation: Children were equally successful using an arrow to deceive under anonymous and public conditions. Study 3 indicated that, under well-controlled conditions, children did not reveal greater understanding of false belief in deceptive than nondeceptive conditions. The results of these studies suggest that children may have greater deceptive abilities than some earlier studies indicated, and that the source of their difficulty on deceptive pointing tasks lies in a failure of inhibitory control. More generally, it is argued that children's performance on false belief tasks is also likely to be affected by inhibition deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  43 in total

1.  Executive function and latent classes of childhood obesity risk.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Riggs; Jimi Huh; Chih-Ping Chou; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-01-05

2.  Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to detect the prefrontal cortical responses to deception under different motivations.

Authors:  Fang Li; Huilin Zhu; Qianqian Gao; Guixiong Xu; Xinge Li; Ziqiang Hu; Sailing He
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Memory maintenance and inhibitory control differentiate from early childhood to adolescence.

Authors:  Yee Lee Shing; Ulman Lindenberger; Adele Diamond; Shu-Chen Li; Matthew C Davidson
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  The development of executive functioning and theory of mind. A comparison of Chinese and U.S. preschoolers.

Authors:  Mark A Sabbagh; Fen Xu; Stephanie M Carlson; Louis J Moses; Kang Lee
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-01

5.  The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study.

Authors:  Courtney Melinda Hale; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2003-06

6.  Hindsight bias and developing theories of mind.

Authors:  Daniel M Bernstein; Cristina Atance; Andrew N Meltzoff; Geoffrey R Loftus
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

7.  A Longitudinal Assessment of the Relation between Executive Function and Theory of Mind at 3, 4, and 5 Years.

Authors:  Stuart Marcovitch; Marion O'Brien; Susan D Calkins; Esther M Leerkes; Jennifer M Weaver; Douglas W Levine
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2015 January-March

8.  A Bayesian framework for the development of belief-desire reasoning: Estimating inhibitory power.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Pernille Hemmer; Alan M Leslie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

9.  Eliciting maltreated and nonmaltreated children's transgression disclosures: narrative practice rapport building and a putative confession.

Authors:  Thomas D Lyon; Lindsay Wandrey; Elizabeth Ahern; Robyn Licht; Megan P Y Sim; Jodi A Quas
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2014-01-27

10.  Children's knowledge of deceptive gaze cues and its relation to their actual lying behavior.

Authors:  Anjanie McCarthy; Kang Lee
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.