Literature DB >> 9680464

Body proportions of Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus and the origin of the genus Homo.

H M McHenry1, L R Berger.   

Abstract

New discoveries of A. africanus fossils from Member 4 Sterkfontein reveal a body form quite unlike earlier Australopithecus species. The new adult material consists of over 48 fore- and hindlimb specimens and includes an associated partial skeleton, Stw 431. The forelimbs and relatively large: the average size of their joints corresponds to a modern human with body mass of 53 kg. The hindlimbs are much smaller with an average size matching a modern human of only 33 kg. Analyses of the Stw 431 partial skeleton confirm these results. In contrast, A. afarensis and anamensis more closely approximate a human pattern of forelimb joint size. This is an unanticipated complication in our understanding of early human evolution. In general, craniodental morphology tracks time in species of Australopithecus: A. anamensis (3.5-4.1 Ma) is the the most primitive with a strongly sloping symphysis, large canine roots, etc., A. afarensis (3.0-3.6 Ma) is less primitive, and A. africanus (2.6-3.0 Ma) shares many derived characteristics with early Homo (e.g., expanded brain, reduced canine, bicuspid lower third premolar, reduced prognathism, greater flexion of the cranial base, deeper TMJ). the new postcranial material, however, reveals an apparently primitive morphology of relatively large forelimb and small hindlimb joints resembling more the pongid than the human pattern. More pongid-like proportions are also present in the two known associated partial skeletons of H. habilis (OH 62 KNM-ER 3735). This may imply either (1) that A. africanus and H. habilis evolved craniodental characters in parallel with the lineage leading to later Homo, or (2) that fore- to hindlimb proportions of A. afarensis (and perhaps A. anamensis) evolved independent of the lineage leading to Homo and does not imply a close phylogenetic link with Homo. Both of these explanations or any other phylogeny imply homoplasy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680464     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1997.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  15 in total

1.  Strontium isotope evidence for landscape use by early hominins.

Authors:  Sandi R Copeland; Matt Sponheimer; Darryl J de Ruiter; Julia A Lee-Thorp; Daryl Codron; Petrus J le Roux; Vaughan Grimes; Michael P Richards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  High levels of sequence polymorphism and linkage disequilibrium at the telomere of 12q: implications for telomere biology and human evolution.

Authors:  D M Baird; J Coleman; Z H Rosser; N J Royle
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology.

Authors:  B Wood; B G Richmond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Pelvic Breadth and Locomotor Kinematics in Human Evolution.

Authors:  Laura Tobias Gruss; Richard Gruss; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  The effects of hypermuscularity on shoulder morphology in myostatin-deficient mice.

Authors:  David J Green; Mark W Hamrick; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  The evolution of the human pelvis: changing adaptations to bipedalism, obstetrics and thermoregulation.

Authors:  Laura Tobias Gruss; Daniel Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion.

Authors:  W E H Harcourt-Smith; L C Aiello
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The evolution of body size and shape in the human career.

Authors:  William L Jungers; Mark Grabowski; Kevin G Hatala; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Why are there apes? Evidence for the co-evolution of ape and monkey ecomorphology.

Authors:  Kevin D Hunt
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  Homoplasy in the evolution of modern human-like joint proportions in Australopithecus afarensis.

Authors:  Anjali M Prabhat; Catherine K Miller; Thomas Cody Prang; Jeffrey Spear; Scott A Williams; Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.