Literature DB >> 9680186

Protein secondary structure prediction in different structural classes.

M M Gromiha1, S Selvaraj.   

Abstract

Information about the secondary structure of a protein can be helpful in understanding its native folded state. In previous work, it was shown that the medium-range interactions predominate in all-alpha class and the long-range interactions predominate in all-beta class proteins. Based on this, in this work the performance of several structure prediction methods in different structural classes of globular proteins was analyzed. It was found that all the methods predict the secondary structures of all-alpha proteins more accurately than other classes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680186     DOI: 10.1093/protein/11.4.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng        ISSN: 0269-2139


  7 in total

1.  Role of hydrophobic clusters and long-range contact networks in the folding of (alpha/beta)8 barrel proteins.

Authors:  S Selvaraj; M Michael Gromiha
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Prediction of inter-residue contact clusters from hydrophobic cores.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Chunmei Liu; Legand Burge; Mohammad Mahmood; William Southerland; Clay Gloster
Journal:  Int J Data Min Bioinform       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 0.667

3.  Characterizing hydrophobicity of amino acid side chains in a protein environment via measuring contact angle of a water nanodroplet on planar peptide network.

Authors:  Chongqin Zhu; Yurui Gao; Hui Li; Sheng Meng; Lei Li; Joseph S Francisco; Xiao Cheng Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure based sequence dependent stiffness scale for trinucleotides: a direct method.

Authors:  M M Gromiha
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Prediction of structural features and application to outer membrane protein identification.

Authors:  Renxiang Yan; Xiaofeng Wang; Lanqing Huang; Feidi Yan; Xiaoyu Xue; Weiwen Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Novel approach for selecting the best predictor for identifying the binding sites in DNA binding proteins.

Authors:  R Nagarajan; Shandar Ahmad; M Michael Gromiha
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Comparative Analysis of TM and Cytoplasmic β-barrel Conformations Using Joint Descriptor.

Authors:  Jayaraman Thangappan; Sangwook Wu; Sun-Gu Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.