Literature DB >> 9680011

Usefulness and limitations of ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

H Yoshii1, M Sato, S Yamamoto, M Motegi, S Okusawa, M Kitano, A Nagashima, M Doi, K Takuma, K Kato, N Aikawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the assessment of blunt abdominal trauma, the reliability of ultrasonography (US) in identifying individual organ injuries remains uncertain, in spite of its usefulness in detecting hemoperitoneum. This study was designed to evaluate the overall diagnostic value of US, including identification of individual organ injuries.
METHODS: The accuracy of US in the detection of intra-abdominal injuries and the identification of individual organ injuries was evaluated in 1,239 patients seen during a 15-year period. Accuracy was based on detection of intraperitoneal fluid, free air, or irregular parenchymal lesions.
RESULTS: For the detection of injuries, US was 94.6% sensitive, 95.1% specific, and 94.9% accurate. Individual organ injuries were identified with sensitivities of 92.4, 90.0, 92.2, 71.4, and 34.7% for the liver, spleen, kidneys, pancreas, and intestine, respectively.
CONCLUSION: US is reliable for the detection of injuries and the identification of solid-organ injuries despite its poor sensitivity for intestinal injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9680011     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199807000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  30 in total

1.  Diagnostic peritoneal lavage for diagnosing blunt hollow visceral injury: the accuracy of two different criteria and their combination.

Authors:  Tomoi Sato; Yasuo Hirose; Hideki Saito; Mutsuo Yamamoto; Norio Katayanagi; Tetsuya Otani; Shirou Kuwabara; Kenichiro Hirano; Hidenori Kinoshita; Toshiharu Tanaka; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Osamu Aizawa; Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Usefulness of multidetector computed tomography for the initial assessment of blunt abdominal trauma patients.

Authors:  Jen-Feng Fang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Being-Chuan Lin; Yu-Pao Hsu; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  [Current diagnostics for intra-abdominal trauma].

Authors:  D Nast-Kolb; H J Bail; G Taeger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Detecting blunt pancreatic injuries.

Authors:  Robert L Cirillo; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Multi detector computed tomography in the diagnosis of bowel injury.

Authors:  Sarita Magu; Shalini Agarwal; Ravinder Singh Gill
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Controversies in emergency radiology. CT versus ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  James T Rhea; Daniel H Garza; Robert A Novelline
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-03-23

Review 7.  Management of liver trauma.

Authors:  S A Badger; R Barclay; P Campbell; D J Mole; T Diamond
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Blunt liver trauma in children.

Authors:  Barbara Schmidt; Günther Schimpl; Michael E Höllwarth
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 9.  [Shock trauma room diagnosis: initial diagnosis after blunt abdominal trauma. A review of the literature].

Authors:  T Lindner; H J Bail; S Manegold; U Stöckle; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Focused abdominal sonography for trauma in the emergency department for blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Chi Leung Tsui; Hin Tat Fung; Kin Lai Chung; Chak Wah Kam
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.