Literature DB >> 9679889

Prostate specific antigen density of the transition zone for early detection of prostate cancer.

B Djavan1, A R Zlotta, G Byttebier, S Shariat, M Omar, C C Schulman, M Marberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compare the ability of several prostate specific antigen (PSA) parameters, including PSA density of the whole prostate and of the transition zone, percent free PSA and PSA velocity, to enhance the specificity for prostate cancer detection and to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with serum PSA levels of 4 to 10.0 ng./ml.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 559 consecutive men referred for early prostate detection or lower urinary tract symptoms who had a serum PSA of 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. All men underwent prostatic ultrasonography and sextant biopsy with 2 additional transition zone biopsies. Specific biopsies of abnormal findings on digital rectal examination were also performed. In all cases if first biopsies were negative an additional set of biopsies was performed within 6 weeks. The ability of PSA density, PSA transition zone, PSA velocity and percent free PSA to improve the power of PSA in the detection of prostate cancer was evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses as well as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: Of 559 patients 342 had histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia and 217 had prostate cancer. Mean serum PSA, PSA velocity, PSA density and PSA transition zone were statistically higher (p <0.018, p <0.037, p <0.0001 and p <0.0001, respectively) and percent free PSA was statistically lower (p <0.0001) in patients with prostate cancer than in those with benign disease. Multivariate analysis and ROC curves showed that PSA transition zone and percent free PSA were the most powerful and highly significant predictors of prostate cancer. Areas under the ROC curve for PSA transition zone and percent free PSA were 0.827 and 0.778, respectively (p=0.01 McNemar test). Combination of free-to-total PSA with PSA transition zone significantly increased the area under the ROC curve compared to PSA transition zone alone (p=0.020). With a 95% sensitivity for prostate cancer detection a PSA transition zone cutoff of 0.25 ng./ml./cc would result in the lowest number of unnecessary biopsies (47% PSA transition zone specificity) compared to all other PSA parameters. However, total prostate volume (greater than 30 cc in 422 men or less than 30 cc in 137) was an important factor in predicting the statistical performance of PSA transition zone. In fact, PSA transition zone did not outperform free percent PSA in sensitivity and specificity when the entire prostate gland volume was less than 30 cc (p=0.094 McNemar test).
CONCLUSIONS: PSA density of the transition zone enhances the specificity of serum PSA for prostate cancer detection in referred patients with a serum PSA of 4.0 to 10.0 ng./ml. compared to other PSA parameters currently available. While PSA transition zone was more effective in prostates greater than 30 cc and percent free PSA was more effective in prostates less than 30 cc, the combination of percent free PSA with PSA transition zone further increased prostate cancer prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Complexed prostate-specific antigen improvement in detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  K Okihara; R J Babaian
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

3.  Utility of the transition zone index for identification of prostate cancer in Chinese men with intermediate PSA levels.

Authors:  Ting-yue Qi; Ya-qing Chen; Jun Jiang; Yun-kai Zhu; Xiao-hong Yao; Xiao-jin Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of free to total ratio of prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen velocity, singly and in combination, in detecting prostate cancer in patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml.

Authors:  Shingo Yamamoto; Takuo Maruyama; Nobuyuki Kondoh; Michio Nojima; Hidekazu Takiuchi; Seiichi Hirota; Hiroki Shima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Biopsy standards for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Markus Margreiter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Prostate transitional zone volume-based nomogram for predicting prostate cancer and high progression prostate cancer in a real-world population.

Authors:  Yanqing Wang; Shaowei Xie; Xun Shangguan; Jiahua Pan; Yinjie Zhu; Zhixiang Xin; Fan Xu; Xiaoguang Shao; Liancheng Fan; Jianjun Sha; Qiang Liu; Baijun Dong; Wei Xue
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume and transition zone volume in Japanese patients with histologically proven benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Y Furuya; S Ohta; N Sato; T Kotake; M Masai
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Improving the utility of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: the use of PSA derivatives and novel markers.

Authors:  S Jain; A G Bhojwani; J K Mellon
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Nanoporous gold as a solid support for protein immobilization and development of an electrochemical immunoassay for prostate specific antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  Binod Pandey; Alexei V Demchenko; Keith J Stine
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.833

10.  Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ibrahim Karademir; Dinggang Shen; Yahui Peng; Shu Liao; Yulei Jiang; Ambereen Yousuf; Gregory Karczmar; Steffen Sammet; Shiyang Wang; Milica Medved; Tatjana Antic; Scott Eggener; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.