Literature DB >> 9679765

Down-regulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in human ovarian cancer cells exposed to adriamycin and ultraviolet radiation.

S Fan1, N F Twu, J A Wang, R Q Yuan, J Andres, I D Goldberg, E M Rosen.   

Abstract

Germ-line mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes predispose women to develop cancers of the breast and ovary, but the biologic functions of these genes remains unclear. We have investigated the responses of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene products to cytotoxic agents in 3 human ovarian cancer cell lines: SK-OV-3 (which contains a p53 deletion mutation), CAOV-3 (which over-expresses a mutant p53) and PA-1 (which expresses wild-type p53). In screening studies, we determined the effects of 7 different agents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression. We found that Adriamycin (ADR) and ultraviolet (UV)radiation significantly down-regulated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA expression in SK-OV-3 cells. On the other hand, camptothecin, nitrogen mustard, taxol, vincristine and etoposide had no effect on BRCA1 or BRCA2 mRNA levels at doses that yielded degrees of cytotoxicity similar to or greater than ADR. The down-regulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNAs was dose and time dependent; significant down-regulation was first observed at 8-16 hr after exposure to ADR. BRCA1 protein levels were also down-regulated following treatment of SK-OV-3 cells with ADR. Similar results were observed in CAOV-3 and PA-1 cells treated with ADR, and this finding could not be directly attributed to ADR-induced changes in the cell cycle distribution. The ADR doses required for significant decreases of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were about 10-15, 5-10 and 2 microM, respectively, for SK-OV-3, CAOV-3 and PA-1; the IC50 doses for loss of cell viability (determined by Trypan blue dye exclusion) were 23, 14 and 0.4 microM, respectively. Thus, at equitoxic doses of ADR, PA-1 cells were more resistant to down-regulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 than SK-OV-3 or CAOV-3. Our findings suggest that 1) BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression in human ovarian cancer cell lines is selectively down-regulated by 2 DNA-damaging agents (ADR and UV radiation); 2) these responses are not due to non-specific cytotoxicity; and 3) the BRCA1 and BRCA2 responses may be dependent, in part, on the p53 functional status of the cells. We speculate that the down-regulation of BRCA1 and BRCA2 may be part of a cellular survival response activated by certain forms of DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679765     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980812)77:4<600::aid-ijc21>3.0.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  9 in total

1.  Expression of common chromosomal fragile site genes, WWOX/FRA16D and FHIT/FRA3B is downregulated by exposure to environmental carcinogens, UV, and BPDE but not by IR.

Authors:  Elangovan Thavathiru; John H Ludes-Meyers; Michael C MacLeod; C Marcelo Aldaz
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.784

2.  Hippophae rhamnoides mediate gene expression profiles against keratinocytes infection of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Humaira Shah; Hafiz Abdullah Shakir; Sher Zaman Safi; Abid Ali
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Simultaneous delivery of chemotherapeutic and thermal-optical agents to cancer cells by a polymeric (PLGA) nanocarrier: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Yuan Tang; Tingjun Lei; Romila Manchanda; Abhignyan Nagesetti; Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez; Supriya Srinivasan; Anthony J McGoron
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  BP1, an isoform of DLX4 homeoprotein, negatively regulates BRCA1 in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  Brian J Kluk; Yebo Fu; Trina A Formolo; Lei Zhang; Anne K Hindle; Yan-gao Man; Robert S Siegel; Patricia E Berg; Chuxia Deng; Timothy A McCaffrey; Sidney W Fu
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 6.580

5.  PI 3 kinase related kinases-independent proteolysis of BRCA1 regulates Rad51 recruitment during genotoxic stress in human cells.

Authors:  Ian Hammond-Martel; Helen Pak; Helen Yu; Raphael Rouget; Andrew A Horwitz; Jeffrey D Parvin; Elliot A Drobetsky; El Bachir Affar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transcriptional autoregulation by BRCA1.

Authors:  Adriana De Siervi; Paola De Luca; Jung S Byun; Li Jun Di; Temesgen Fufa; Cynthia M Haggerty; Elba Vazquez; Cristian Moiola; Dan L Longo; Kevin Gardner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Egr-1 regulates the transcription of the BRCA1 gene by etoposide.

Authors:  Soon Young Shin; Chang Gun Kim; Young Han Lee
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.778

8.  Impact of Etoposide on BRCA1 Expression in Various Breast Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Xi Zhang; Simone Hofmann; Nadia Harbeck; Udo Jeschke; Sophie Sixou
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2017-12

9.  Methylation and protein expression of DNA repair genes: association with chemotherapy exposure and survival in sporadic ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Swisher; Rachel M Gonzalez; Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Rochelle L Garcia; Tom Walsh; Barbara A Goff; Piri Welcsh
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 27.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.