Literature DB >> 9679320

Waiting with and without recombination: the time to production of a double mutant.

F B Christiansen1, S P Otto, A Bergman, M W Feldman.   

Abstract

R.A. Fisher and H.J. Muller argued in the 1930s that a major evolutionary advantage of recombination is that it allows favorable mutations to be combined within an individual even when they first appear in different individuals. This effect is evaluated in a two-locus, two-allele model by calculating the average waiting time until a new genotypic combination first appears in a haploid population. Three approximations are developed and compared with Monte Carlo simulations of the Wright-Fisher process of random genetic drift in a finite population. First, a crude method, based on the deterministic accumulation of single mutants, produces a waiting time of 1/square root of N mu(2) with no recombination and [formula: see text] with recombination between the two loci, where mu is the mutation rate, N is the haploid population size, and R is the recombination rate. Second, the waiting time is calculated as the expected value of a heterogeneous geometric distribution obtained from a branching process approximation. This gives accurate estimates for small values of N mu large. The estimates for small values of N mu are considerably lower than the simulated values. Finally, diffusion analysis of the Wright-Fisher process provides accurate estimates for N mu small, and the time scales of the diffusion process show a difference between R = 0 and for R >> 0 of the same order of magnitude as seen in the deterministic analysis. In the absence of recombination, accurate approximations to the waiting time are obtained by using the branching process for high N mu and the diffusion approximation for low N mu. For low N mu the waiting time is well approximated by 1/the square root of 8N2 mu(3). With R >> 0, the following dependence on N mu is observed: For N mu > 1 the waiting time is virtually independent of recombination and is well described by the branching process approximation. For N mu approximately equal to 1 the waiting time is well described by a simplified diffusion approximation that assumes symmetry in the frequencies of single mutants. For N mu << 1 the waiting time is well described by the diffusion approximation allowing asymmetry in the frequencies of single mutants. Recombination lowers the waiting time until a new genotypic combination first appears, but the effect is small compared to that of the mutation rate and population size. For large N mu, recombination has a negligible effect, and its effect is strongest for small N mu, in which case the waiting time approaches a fixed fraction of the waiting time for R = 0. Free recombination lowers the waiting time to about 45% of the waiting time for absolute linkage for small N mu. Selection has little effect on the importance of recombination in general.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9679320     DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  14 in total

1.  Selection intensity against deleterious mutations in RNA secondary structures and rate of compensatory nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  H Innan; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of functionally conserved enhancers can be accelerated in large populations: a population-genetic model.

Authors:  Ashley J R Carter; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Mutators and sex in bacteria: conflict between adaptive strategies.

Authors:  O Tenaillon; H Le Nagard; B Godelle; F Taddei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Scaling expectations for the time to establishment of complex adaptations.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The rate of establishment of complex adaptations.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; Adam Abegg
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 6.  Connecting theory and data to understand recombination rate evolution.

Authors:  Amy L Dapper; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Stochastic interplay between mutation and recombination during the acquisition of drug resistance mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  Christian L Althaus; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  The rate at which asexual populations cross fitness valleys.

Authors:  Daniel B Weissman; Michael M Desai; Daniel S Fisher; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  The rate of fitness-valley crossing in sexual populations.

Authors:  Daniel B Weissman; Marcus W Feldman; Daniel S Fisher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Adaptation to the cost of resistance: a model of compensation, recombination, and selection in a haploid organism.

Authors:  Pieter J Wijngaarden; Frank van den Bosch; Michael J Jeger; Rolf F Hoekstra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.