Literature DB >> 9678349

Non-random X chromosome inactivation in mammalian cells.

B R Migeon1.   

Abstract

A salient feature of mammalian X dosage compensation is that X-inactivation occurs without regard to the parental origin of either active or inactive X. However, there are variations on the theme of random inactivation, namely paternal X inactivation in marsupials and in placental tissues of some mammals. Whether inactivation is random or paternal seems to depend on the time when this developmental program is initiated. As deletions of the X inactivation center (XIC/Xic) and/or the X inactive specific transcript (XIST/Xist) gene result in failure of cis X-inactivation, mutations in genes from this region might lead to preferential inactivation of one X chromosome or the other. The Xce locus in the murine Xic is considered a prototype for this model. Recent studies suggest that choice involves maintaining the activity of one X, while the other(s) by default is programmed to become inactive. Also, choice resides within the XIC, so that mutations elsewhere, although perhaps able to interfere with cis inactivation, are not likely to affect the X chromosome from only one parent. Mutations affecting the choice of active X will be more difficult to detect in humans than in inbred laboratory mice because of the greater allelic differences between maternal and paternal X chromosomes; some of these differences predispose to growth competition between the mosaic cell populations. I suggest that the skewing of inactivation patterns observed in human females most often occurs after random X inactivation, and is due mainly to cell selection favoring alleles that provide a relative growth advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9678349     DOI: 10.1159/000014971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  32 in total

Review 1.  Sex Chromosome Genetics '99. The X chromosome and recurrent spontaneous abortion: the significance of transmanifesting carriers.

Authors:  M C Lanasa; W A Hogge; E P Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A longitudinal study of X-inactivation ratio in human females.

Authors:  Ionel Sandovici; Anna K Naumova; Mark Leppert; Yendi Linares; Carmen Sapienza
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Heterogeneous X inactivation in trophoblastic cells of human full-term female placentas.

Authors:  L H Looijenga; A J Gillis; A J Verkerk; W L van Putten; J W Oosterhuis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Skewed X chromosome inactivation and trisomic spontaneous abortion: no association.

Authors:  Dorothy Warburton; Jennie Kline; Ann Kinney; Chih-Yu Yu; Bruce Levin; Stephen Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Integration of Genetic Testing and Pathology for the Diagnosis of Adults with FSGS.

Authors:  Tony Yao; Khalil Udwan; Rohan John; Akanchaya Rana; Amirreza Haghighi; Lizhen Xu; Saidah Hack; Heather N Reich; Michelle Adrienne Hladunewich; Daniel C Cattran; Andrew D Paterson; York Pei; Moumita Barua
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 6.  Genodermatoses caused by genetic mosaicism.

Authors:  M Vreeburg; M A M van Steensel
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  A novel ribosomopathy caused by dysfunction of RPL10 disrupts neurodevelopment and causes X-linked microcephaly in humans.

Authors:  Susan S Brooks; Alissa L Wall; Christelle Golzio; David W Reid; Amalia Kondyles; Jason R Willer; Christina Botti; Christopher V Nicchitta; Nicholas Katsanis; Erica E Davis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Comparison of X-chromosome inactivation patterns in multiple tissues from human females.

Authors:  D C Bittel; M F Theodoro; N Kibiryeva; W Fischer; Z Talebizadeh; M G Butler
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Is gestation in Prader-Willi syndrome affected by the genetic subtype?

Authors:  Merlin G Butler; Jennifer Sturich; Susan E Myers; June-Anne Gold; Virginia Kimonis; Daniel J Driscoll
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Evidence for a Turner syndrome locus or loci at Xp11.2-p22.1.

Authors:  A R Zinn; V S Tonk; Z Chen; W L Flejter; H A Gardner; R Guerra; H Kushner; S Schwartz; V P Sybert; D L Van Dyke; J L Ross
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.