Literature DB >> 9678064

Frameshift mismatch recognition by the human MutS alpha complex.

P Macpherson1, O Humbert, P Karran.   

Abstract

DNA mismatch binding by an extensively purified hMutS alpha mismatch recognition complex was investigated using a bandshift assay. The complex bound to G. T mispairs and to looped structures containing an unpaired single or two adjacent bases. A CA loop was preferentially recognised if the unpaired bases formed part of a repeated sequence. In general, single base loops were also more favourably recognised by hMutS alpha when present in monotonic runs of two to five. In one series of substrates, based on a known hotspot for frameshift mutations in the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene, in which different length G, A, C or T tracts were flanked by closely similar sequences, an A loop was bound preferentially in the absence of adjacent As and a C loop in the absence of adjacent Cs. This preferential binding was influenced by the base immediately 5' to the loop. Thus, while repeated regions generally favour recognition of single base loops by hMutS alpha, other factors related to local sequence may influence this interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9678064     DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8777(98)00017-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  7 in total

1.  Replication of 2-hydroxyadenine-containing DNA and recognition by human MutSalpha.

Authors:  Flavia Barone; Scott D McCulloch; Peter Macpherson; Giovanni Maga; Masami Yamada; Takehiko Nohmi; Anna Minoprio; Filomena Mazzei; Thomas A Kunkel; Peter Karran; Margherita Bignami
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-12-26

2.  Sequence composition and context effects on the generation and repair of frameshift intermediates in mononucleotide runs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B D Harfe; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Removal of frameshift intermediates by mismatch repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  B D Harfe; S Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  hMSH2 expression is driven by AP1-dependent regulation through phorbol-ester exposure.

Authors:  Odile Humbert; Ikbel Achour; Dominique Lautier; Guy Laurent; Bernard Salles
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  8-oxoguanine incorporation into DNA repeats in vitro and mismatch recognition by MutSalpha.

Authors:  Peter Macpherson; Flavia Barone; Giovanni Maga; Filomena Mazzei; Peter Karran; Margherita Bignami
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  A 'Semi-Protected Oligonucleotide Recombination' Assay for DNA Mismatch Repair in vivo Suggests Different Modes of Repair for Lagging Strand Mismatches.

Authors:  Eric A Josephs; Piotr E Marszalek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  G-Quadruplex Formed by the Promoter Region of the hTERT Gene: Structure-Driven Effects on DNA Mismatch Repair Functions.

Authors:  Anzhela V Pavlova; Victoria Yu Savitskaya; Nina G Dolinnaya; Mayya V Monakhova; Anastasia V Litvinova; Elena A Kubareva; Maria I Zvereva
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-08-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.