Literature DB >> 9676658

Authorship: the coin of the realm, the source of complaints.

L J Wilcox1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Disputes associated with achieving recognition for work done may affect both morale and subsequent resource allocation to medical researchers.
OBJECTIVE: To assess authorship disputes brought to the Ombuds Office.
SETTING: The Ombuds Office, Harvard Medical School, Dental School, School of Public Health, and affiliated hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in number of queries related to authorship between 1991 to 1992 and 1996 to 1997.
RESULTS: Disputes increased from 8 (2.3%) of 355 issues brought to the office in 1991 to 1992 to 59 (10.7%) of 551 issues in 1996 to 1997. They also increased from involving 0.06% of the total population of faculty, staff, and students affiliated with the schools in 1991 to 1992 to 0.33% of the total population in 1996 to 1997. Such problems appear to occur more often for women (53% of complaints in 1994-1995 through 1996-1997) and for non-US citizens (21 % of complaints in 1991-1992 through 1996-1997).
CONCLUSIONS: Authorship disputes are increasingly frequent. Institutions should increase enforcement of published authorship standards and place more emphasis on managerial skills for laboratory and research department heads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9676658     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.3.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

Review 1.  Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Kenneth D Pimple
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Authorship policies of scientific journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Ana M Tyler; Jennifer R Black; Grace Kissling
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Good research conduct.

Authors:  J Grigg
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Publish together or perish: the increasing number of authors per article in academic journals is the consequence of a changing scientific culture. Some researchers define authorship quite loosely.

Authors:  Christopher Baethge
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Authorship policies of bioethics journals.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Zubin Master
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Factors that Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts.

Authors:  John Lynch; Jane E Strasser; Christopher J Lindsell; Joel Tsevat
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2013

7.  Best practices for allocating appropriate credit and responsibility to authors of multi-authored articles.

Authors:  Lucas D Eggert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 8.  A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines.

Authors:  Ana Marušić; Lana Bošnjak; Ana Jerončić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences.

Authors:  David F Feldon; James Peugh; Michelle A Maher; Josipa Roksa; Colby Tofel-Grehl
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  "Conferring authorship": biobank stakeholders' experiences with publication credit in collaborative research.

Authors:  Flora M A Colledge; Bernice S Elger; David M Shaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.