Literature DB >> 9675694

A least-squares estimation approach to improving the precision of inverse dynamics computations.

A D Kuo1.   

Abstract

A least-squares approach to computing inverse dynamics is proposed. The method utilizes equations of motion for a multi-segment body, incorporating terms for ground reaction forces and torques. The resulting system is overdetermined at each point in time, because kinematic and force measurements outnumber unknown torques, and may be solved using weighted least squares to yield estimates of the joint torques and joint angular accelerations that best match measured data. An error analysis makes it possible to predict error magnitudes for both conventional and least-squares methods. A modification of the method also makes it possible to reject constant biases such as those arising from misalignment of force plate and kinematic measurement reference frames. A benchmark case is presented, which demonstrates reductions in joint torque errors on the order of 30 percent compared to the conventional Newton-Euler method, for a wide range of noise levels on measured data. The advantages over the Newton-Euler method include making best use of all available measurements, ability to function when less than a full complement of ground reaction forces is measured, suppression of residual torques acting on the top-most body segment, and the rejection of constant biases in data.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9675694     DOI: 10.1115/1.2834295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  24 in total

1.  Computational techniques for using insole pressure sensors to analyse three-dimensional joint kinetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Chumanov; C David Remy; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  A mathematical tool to generate complex whole body motor tasks and test hypotheses on underlying motor planning.

Authors:  Michele Tagliabue; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Thierry Pozzo; Giancarlo Ferrigno
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  How visual information links to multijoint coordination during quiet standing.

Authors:  J P Scholz; E Park; J J Jeka; G Schöner; T Kiemel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reactive control and its operation limits in responding to a novel slip in gait.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Knee and elbow 3D strength surfaces: peak torque-angle-velocity relationships.

Authors:  Laura A Frey-Law; Andrea Laake; Keith G Avin; Jesse Heitsman; Tim Marler; Karim Abdel-Malek
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 7.  Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Andrea Cereatti; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Silvia Fantozzi; Rita Stagni; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Muscle contributions to support and progression over a range of walking speeds.

Authors:  May Q Liu; Frank C Anderson; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Optimized prediction of contact force application during side-lying lumbar manipulation.

Authors:  Casey A Myers; Brian A Enebo; Bradley S Davidson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.