Literature DB >> 9675177

Hydration and conformational equilibria of simple hydrophobic and amphiphilic solutes.

H S Ashbaugh1, E W Kaler, M E Paulaitis.   

Abstract

We consider whether the continuum model of hydration optimized to reproduce vacuum-to-water transfer free energies simultaneously describes the hydration free energy contributions to conformational equilibria of the same solutes in water. To this end, transfer and conformational free energies of idealized hydrophobic and amphiphilic solutes in water are calculated from explicit water simulations and compared to continuum model predictions. As benchmark hydrophobic solutes, we examine the hydration of linear alkanes from methane through hexane. Amphiphilic solutes were created by adding a charge of +/-1e to a terminal methyl group of butane. We find that phenomenological continuum parameters fit to transfer free energies are significantly different from those fit to conformational free energies of our model solutes. This difference is attributed to continuum model parameters that depend on solute conformation in water, and leads to effective values for the free energy/surface area coefficient and Born radii that best describe conformational equilibrium. In light of these results, we believe that continuum models of hydration optimized to fit transfer free energies do not accurately capture the balance between hydrophobic and electrostatic contributions that determines the solute conformational state in aqueous solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9675177      PMCID: PMC1299750          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77565-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  19 in total

1.  The pressure dependence of hydrophobic interactions is consistent with the observed pressure denaturation of proteins.

Authors:  G Hummer; S Garde; A E García; M E Paulaitis; L R Pratt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure.

Authors:  F M Richards
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng       Date:  1977

Review 3.  The modelling of electrostatic interactions in the function of globular proteins.

Authors:  N K Rogers
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  SMART: a solvent-accessible triangulated surface generator for molecular graphics and boundary element applications.

Authors:  R J Zauhar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel beta-sheets.

Authors:  A S Yang; B Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-09-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry.

Authors:  B Honig; A Nicholls
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Plastids better red than dead.

Authors:  I Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Application of scaled particle theory to model the hydrophobic effect: implications for molecular association and protein stability.

Authors:  R M Jackson; M J Sternberg
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

9.  On the origins of the hydrophobic effect: observations from simulations of n-dodecane in model solvents.

Authors:  A Wallqvist; D G Covell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: I. alpha-Helices.

Authors:  A S Yang; B Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-09-22       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  2 in total

1.  Conformational equilibria of alkanes in aqueous solution: relationship to water structure near hydrophobic solutes.

Authors:  H S Ashbaugh; S Garde; G Hummer; E W Kaler; M E Paulaitis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Reconciling the understanding of 'hydrophobicity' with physics-based models of proteins.

Authors:  Robert C Harris; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.