| Literature DB >> 9675019 |
K J Rees-Milton1, Z Jia, N C Green, M Bhatia, O El-Kabbani, T G Flynn.
Abstract
The only major structural difference between aldehyde reductase, a primarily NADPH-dependent aldo-keto reductase, and aldose reductase, a dually coenzyme-specific (NADPH/NADH) member of the same superfamily, is an additional eight amino acid residues in the substrate/inhibitor binding site (C-terminal region) of aldehyde reductase. On the premise that this segment defines the substrate specificity of the enzyme, a mutant of aldehyde reductase lacking residues 306-313 was constructed. In contrast to wild-type enzyme, the mutant enzyme reduced a narrower range of aldehydes and the new substrate specificity was not similar to aldose reductase as might have been predicted. A major change in coenzyme specificity was observed, however, the mutant enzyme being distinctly NADH preferring(Km, NADH = 35 microM, compared to <5 mM for wild-type and Km, NADPH = 670 microM, compared to 35 microM for wild type). Upon analyzing coordinates of aldehyde and aldose reductase, we found that deletion of residues 306-313 may have created a truncated enzyme that retained the three-dimensional structural features of the enzyme's C-terminal segment. The change in substrate specificity could be explained by the new alignment of amino acids. The reversal of coenzyme specificity appeared to be due to a significant backbone shift initiated by the formation of a strong hydrogen bond between Tyr319 and Val300. A similar bond exists in aldose reductase (Tyr309-Ala299). It appears, therefore, that as far as coenzyme specificity is concerned, deletion of residues 306-313 has converted aldehyde reductase into an aldose reductase-like enzyme. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9675019 DOI: 10.1006/abbi.1998.0721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Biochem Biophys ISSN: 0003-9861 Impact factor: 4.013