Literature DB >> 9674685

Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive.

S E Bishara1, M E Olsen, P Damon, J R Jakobsen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a new light-cured bonding system that used a hybrid adhesive containing a resin reinforced glass ionomer (Fuji Ortho LC, GC America, Inc.) with a more traditional light-cured bonding system (Transbond, 3M Unitek) that contained resin material only. Seventy-five recently extracted human molars were collected and stored in a solution of 0.1% (weight/volume) thymol. The teeth were randomly separated into five groups of 15 molars each: Group I--using Transbond adhesive system with the enamel etched and dried before bonding. Group II--using Fuji Ortho LC (FOLC) adhesive system with no etch and the enamel wet with water before bonding. Group III--using FOLC adhesive system with the enamel etched and wet with water before bonding. Group IV--using FOLC adhesive system with no etch and the enamel wet with saliva before bonding. Group V--using FOLC adhesive system with the enamel etched and wet with saliva before bonding. The shear bond strength was performed after thermal cycling between 5 degrees +/- 2 degrees C and 50 degrees +/- 2 degrees C for a total of 2000 cycles with the Zwick test machine (Zwick Gm bH & Co.). After debonding, the teeth and brackets were examined under x10 magnification to evaluate the site of bond failure and the presence of residual adhesive. The analysis of variance was used to determine whether significant differences existed between the various groups. The findings indicated that there were no statistically significant differences among the three experimental groups I, III, and V that had the enamel surface etched before bonding, regardless of the adhesive used or the enamel surface contamination with water or saliva. On the other hand, the two experimental groups that did not have the enamel etched before bonding (II and IV) had significantly lower bond strengths. In conclusion, etching the enamel surface is a critical variable that affects shear bond strength as well as bond failure location when using the new adhesive system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9674685     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70242-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Effect of short curing times with a high-intensity light-emitting diode or high-power halogen on shear bond strength of metal brackets before and after thermocycling.

Authors:  Erion Cerekja; Banu Cakirer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A comparative evaluation of the retention of metallic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement under different enamel preparations: A pilot study.

Authors:  Padmaja Sharma; Ashima Valiathan; Ankit Arora; Sachin Agarwal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2013-04

3.  Are the low-shrinking composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?

Authors:  Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk; Kenan Cantekin; Sezer Demirbuga; Mehmet Ali Ozturk
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-07

4.  Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate.

Authors:  Behrad Tanbakuchi; Tabassom Hooshmand; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard; Kiana Shekofteh; Arian Hesam Arefi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Self-etching Adhesives: An In-Vitro Study.

Authors:  Chandrashekhar Yadala; Rajkumar Gaddam; Siddarth Arya; K V Baburamreddy; V Ramakrishnam Raju; Praveen Kumar Varma
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-07

6.  Effect of acid etching on bond strength of nanoionomer as an orthodontic bonding adhesive.

Authors:  Saba Khan; Sanjeev K Verma; Sandhya Maheshwari
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

7.  In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Different Adhesives.

Authors:  Junaid Ahmed Shaik; Rajesh Kumar Reddy; K Bhagyalakshmi; Mithun J Shah; O Madhavi; S Venkat Ramesh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.