Literature DB >> 9674614

Variations in standardized hospital mortality rates for six common medical diagnoses: implications for profiling hospital quality.

G E Rosenthal1, A Shah, L E Way, D L Harper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The authors determined whether standardized hospital mortality rates varied for six common medical diagnoses.
METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included 89,851 patients aged 18 years and older discharged from 30 hospitals in a large metropolitan area in 1991 to 1993 with a principal diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, stroke, obstructive lung disease, or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. For each hospital, standardized mortality ratios (observed/predicted mortality) were determined using validated risk-adjustment models that were based on clinical data elements abstracted from patients' hospital records. Hospitals also were categorized into quintiles on the basis of standardized mortality ratios. Correlations between standardized mortality ratios and agreement between quintile rankings were determined for each pair of diagnoses.
RESULTS: Correlations between hospital-standardized mortality ratios for individual diagnoses were generally weak. For the 15 possible pairs of diagnoses, Pearson coefficients ranged from -0.10 to 0.43; only six were 0.30 or greater. Agreement between hospital quintile rankings was also generally low, with weighted kappa values ranging from -0.12 to 0.42. Three of 15 kappa values were less than 0 (ie, agreement lower than chance), and only four exceeded 0.20, the threshold for "fair" agreement. Although simulated analyses found that random variation and relatively low hospital volumes accounted for some of the difference in standardized mortality ratios for diagnoses, a large proportion of the difference remained unexplained.
CONCLUSIONS: Standardized hospital mortality rates varied for six diagnoses that likely are managed by similar practitioners. Although variability may be decreased by restricting analyses to hospitals with large volumes, the findings indicate that for many hospitals, diagnosis-specific mortality rates may be an inconsistent measure of hospital quality, even when data are aggregated for multiple years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9674614     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199807000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  14 in total

1.  Relationships between in-hospital and 30-day standardized hospital mortality: implications for profiling hospitals.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D W Baker; D G Norris; L E Way; D L Harper; R J Snow
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Are mortality rates for different operations related?: implications for measuring the quality of noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Douglas O Staiger; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Hospital mortality: when failure is not a good measure of success.

Authors:  Kaveh G Shojania; Alan J Forster
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The relationship between patients' perception of care and measures of hospital quality and safety.

Authors:  Thomas Isaac; Alan M Zaslavsky; Paul D Cleary; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Conditional Length of Stay.

Authors:  J H Silber; P R Rosenbaum; L F Koziol; N Sutaria; R R Marsh; O Even-Shoshan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prediction of mortality for congestive heart failure patients: results from different wards of an Italian teaching hospital.

Authors:  N Nante; M F De Marco; D Balzi; P Addari; E Buiatti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Profiling hospitals by survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hui Zheng; Wei Zhang; John Z Ayanian; Lawrence B Zaborski; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Are diagnosis specific outcome indicators based on administrative data useful in assessing quality of hospital care?

Authors:  I Scott; D Youlden; M Coory
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-02

9.  Correlations among risk-standardized mortality rates and among risk-standardized readmission rates within hospitals.

Authors:  Leora I Horwitz; Yongfei Wang; Mayur M Desai; Leslie A Curry; Elizabeth H Bradley; Elizabeth E Drye; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.960

10.  Variations in mortality in children admitted with pneumonia to Kenyan hospitals.

Authors:  Philip Ayieko; Emelda A Okiro; Tansy Edwards; Rachel Nyamai; Mike English
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.