Literature DB >> 9674376

Preferred position of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences.

W Jaschinski1, H Heuer, H Kylian.   

Abstract

At office workplaces equipped with visual display units (VDU) that were adjustable to various positions relative to the eyes short and long viewing distances from the eyes to the screen were imposed (mean value of about 63 and 92 cm) at two levels of screen height so that the visual target was either at eye level or 18 cm below, on the average. The change from far to near viewing distance produced a larger increase in eyestrain when the VDUs were at eye level. High screens resulted in greater eyestrain than low screens, as shown by correlations over subjects. When operators were free to adjust the most comfortable screen position, the group of 22 participants preferred viewing distances between 60 and 100 cm and vertical inclination of gaze direction between horizontal and -16 degrees downwards. However, within most subjects the range of preferred screen positions was much smaller. Between 3 days during a 1-month period the test-retest correlations of the preferred screen positions were highly significant, both for viewing distance and vertical gaze inclination. When operators were forced to work at a shorter distance than their preferred viewing distance they reported more visual strain. Thus, operators appear to prefer an individual adjustment of the screen relative to the eyes in order to avoid visual strain and discomfort at VDU work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9674376     DOI: 10.1080/001401398186586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the usability of two types of image display systems, during laparoscopy.

Authors:  M A Veelen; J J Jakimowicz; R H M Goossens; D W Meijer; J B J Bussmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Working conditions, visual fatigue, and mental health among systems analysts in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  L E Rocha; M Debert-Ribeiro
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  A field intervention examining the impact of an office ergonomics training and a highly adjustable chair on visual symptoms in a public sector organization.

Authors:  Benjamin C Amick; Cammie Chaumont Menéndez; Lianna Bazzani; Michelle Robertson; Kelly DeRango; Ted Rooney; Anne Moore
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 4.  Epistemology of visual imaging in endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Ocular surface area and human eye blink frequency during VDU work: the effect of monitor position and task.

Authors:  Pernille Kofoed Nielsen; Karen Søgaard; Jørgen Skotte; Peder Wolkoff
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  A blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the Google Glass experience.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Roy Phitayakorn; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Ozanan Meireles
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Ergonomics perspective for identifying and reducing internal operative flow disruption for laparoscopic urological surgery.

Authors:  Latif Al-Hakim; Jiaquan Xiao; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Psychological factors and visual fatigue in working with video display terminals.

Authors:  F Mocci; A Serra; G A Corrias
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  The weight of computer mouse affects the wrist motion and forearm muscle activity during fast operation speed task.

Authors:  Han-Ming Chen; Chang-Sian Lee; Chih-Hsiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  A community-based study of asthenopia in computer operators.

Authors:  Dinesh J Bhanderi; Sushilkumar Choudhary; Vikas G Doshi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.