Literature DB >> 9673609

Barriers to prenatal care: factors associated with late initiation of care in a middle-class midwestern community.

R O Roberts1, B P Yawn, S L Wickes, C S Field, M Garretson, S J Jacobsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Barriers to prenatal care have been extensively investigated in low-income and inner-city communities. Less attention has been directed to the study of prenatal care among middle- and upper-class pregnant women. This study describes perceived barriers and factors associated with late initiation of prenatal care in a predominantly middle- to upper-class midwestern community.
METHODS: Consenting women in Olmsted County, Minnesota, who were attending a clinic for their first obstetric visit completed a self-administered questionnaire that queried the presence of factors making it difficult to receive prenatal care, perception about the importance of prenatal care, expectations at the first prenatal care visit, and sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS: Of the 813 women aged 14 to 47 years, 692 (86%) had their first prenatal visit within the first trimester of pregnancy. Only 98 (12%) women reported external barriers to receiving prenatal care. These factors included difficulty in getting an appointment (46.9%), problems finding child care (26.5%), and lack of transportation (14.3%). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, late initiation of care was associated with patient perception of prenatal care as being less than very important (odds ratio [OR] = 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-9.7); external barriers to prenatal care (OR = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.6-5.4); annual income < $17,000 (OR = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.5-5.7); and an unintended pregnancy (OR = 2.1, 95% CI, 1.3-3.5). Multiparous women and women older than 35 years were more likely to perceive prenatal care as less than very important (OR = 3.9, 95% CI, 2.5-14.6 and OR = 2.9, 95% CI, 1.2-6.8, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that perceptions about the importance of prenatal care may play a greater role in the initiation of care among this group of women than is recognized. Women with more experience with pregnancy appear to place slightly less importance on prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9673609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  10 in total

1.  Hispanic ethnicity, rural residence, and regular source of care.

Authors:  James E Rohrer; Gina Kruse; Yun Zhang
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-02

2.  Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

Review 3.  Mainstreaming nutrition in maternal, newborn and child health: barriers to seeking services from existing maternal, newborn, child health programmes.

Authors:  Peter K Streatfield; Tracey P Koehlmoos; Nurul Alam; Malay K Mridha
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  How racial and ethnic groupings may mask disparities: the importance of separating Pacific Islanders from Asians in prenatal care data.

Authors:  Clea C Sarnquist; Erin Moix Grieb; Yvonne A Maldonado
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-07-07

5.  The influence of proximity of prenatal services on small-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Katherine E Heck; Kenneth C Schoendorf; Gilberto F Chavez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-02

6.  Unintended pregnancy in a commercially insured population.

Authors:  Diane C Green; Julie A Gazmararian; Lisa D Mahoney; Nancy A Davis
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-09

7.  Home or away? Factors affecting where women choose to give birth.

Authors:  Barbara Zelek; Eliseo Orrantia; Heather Poole; Jessica Strike
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Explaining ethnic differences in late antenatal care entry by predisposing, enabling and need factors in The Netherlands. The Generation R Study.

Authors:  A A Choté; G T Koopmans; W K Redekop; C J M de Groot; R J Hoefman; V W V Jaddoe; A Hofman; E A P Steegers; J P Mackenbach; M Trappenburg; M Foets
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-08

9.  Unintended childbearing and knowledge of emergency contraception in a population-based survey of postpartum women.

Authors:  Kimberley A Goldsmith; Laurin J Kasehagen; Kenneth D Rosenberg; Alfredo P Sandoval; Jodi A Lapidus
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-07

10.  Predisposing individual characteristics and perinatal outcomes of women in the Tokyo metropolitan area who initiate prenatal care late in their pregnancy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Kakogawa; Miyuki Sadatsuki; Takeji Matsushita; Takuro Simbo
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-08-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.