Literature DB >> 9673564

Late results of heterotopic autotransplantation of splenic tissue into the greater omentum.

T Weber1, E Hanisch, R P Baum, R M Seufert.   

Abstract

There is still controversy about the beneficial effects of splenic autotransplantation. As a result, replantation of the spleen has almost been abandoned for surgical treatment of splenic injuries. To learn more about the long-term effects we have analyzed eight patients 9.2 +/- 1.2 years after autotransplantation of the spleen into the greater omentum. Splenic replants could be detected by scintigraphy in seven patients (87.5%). Splenic size, measured by single-photon emission computed tomography, varied between 19.344 and 471.705 units of volume (Uov). Two patients with the smallest replants had pathologic changes of leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets in 12 of 16 measurements (75%). These changes closely resembled a spleenless state and were similar to those in the patient with no detectable splenic autograft. In contrast, five patients with large splenic replants (49.192-471.705 UoV) revealed pathologic findings in only 2 of 40 measurements (5%). Based on an extensive review of the literature and our own results, it can be concluded that splenic autotransplantation into the greater omentum is superior to splenectomy but undoubtedly less effective than in situ preservation of the spleen. Therefore splenic replantation should still be considered, particularly in pediatric surgery, when in situ preservation of the spleen is not possible by other techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9673564     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

Review 1.  Regeneration of autotransplanted splenic fragments: basic immunological and clinical relevance.

Authors:  R Pabst
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  The omentum.

Authors:  Cameron Platell; Deborah Cooper; John M Papadimitriou; John C Hall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Antibody response of autogenous splenic tissue implanted in the abdominal cavity of mice.

Authors:  Sérgio I Nunes; Alice B Rezende; Francisco M Teixeira; Ana Paula Ferreira; Márcio M J Alves; Nelson Jamel; Raimunda V C Assis; Henrique C Teixeira
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Splenic trauma in the twenty-first century: changing trends in management.

Authors:  P Roy; R Mukherjee; M Parik
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A rare diagnosis for a pancreatic mass: splenosis.

Authors:  Pietro Fiamingo; Massimiliano Veroux; Antonio Da Rold; Silvio Guerriero; Stefano Pariset; Antonino Buffone; Umberto Tedeschi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Twenty years of splenic preservation in trauma: lower early infection rate than in splenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gauer; Susanne Gerber-Paulet; Christian Seiler; Walter Paul Schweizer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Critical mass of splenic autotransplant needed for the development of phagocytic activity in rats.

Authors:  R G Marques; C E R Caetano; C F Diestel; E Lima; M C Portela; A V Oliveira; M B N Oliveira; M Bernardo-Filho
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Post-splenectomy sepsis: preventative strategies, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Sarah Luu; Denis Spelman; Ian J Woolley
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.