Literature DB >> 9672545

Classification and low back pain: a review of the literature and critical analysis of selected systems.

D L Riddle1.   

Abstract

Classification systems for patients with low back pain have become more abundant in the literature since the mid-1980s. Some classification systems are designed to determine the most appropriate treatment, some are designed to aid in prognosis, and others are designed to identify pathology. Still other classification systems categorize patients into homogeneous groups based on selected variables. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate low back pain classification systems. Several classification systems were summarized and examined. Four classification systems that were judged to be the most commonly cited and most relevant to physical therapists were critiqued using a more thorough systematic approach. The analysis suggests that future research should address the usefulness of existing classification systems as well as the development of new classification systems designed using commonly accepted measurement principles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9672545     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.7.708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  15 in total

1.  Disentangling classification systems from their individual categories and the category-specific criteria: an essential consideration to evaluate clinical utility.

Authors:  Julie Fritz
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

2.  Low back pain: the time to become invested in clinical practice guidelines is now.

Authors:  Rob A B Oostendorp; Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC).

Authors:  Bo C Bertilson; Johan Bring; Anneli Sjöblom; Karin Sundell; Lars-Erik Strender
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A classification system for the assessment of lumbar pain in athletes.

Authors:  J F Heck; J M Sparano
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Prevalence of classification methods for patients with lumbar impairments using the McKenzie syndromes, pain pattern, manipulation, and stabilization clinical prediction rules.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Dennis Hart; Dave Oliver; Troy McGill; David Grigsby; Jason Ward; Jon Weinberg; William Oswald; Guillermo Cutrone
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-12

7.  Clinical presentation and manual therapy for lower quadrant musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Carol A Courtney; Jeffrey D Clark; Alison M Duncombe; Michael A O'Hearn
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-11

8.  Management of low back pain: a case series illustrating the pragmatic combination of treatment- and mechanism-based classification systems.

Authors:  Daniel Pinto; Joshua Cleland; Jessica Palmer; Sarah L Eberhart
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

9.  Reliability of novice raters in using the movement system impairment approach to classify people with low back pain.

Authors:  Sharon M Henry; Linda R Van Dillen; Andrea R Trombley; Justine M Dee; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-15

10.  TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS ACTIVATION AND TIMING IMPROVES FOLLOWING CORE STABILITY TRAINING: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL.

Authors:  Noelle M Selkow; Molly R Eck; Stephen Rivas
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.