Literature DB >> 9672087

Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone?

D B Burr1, C H Turner, P Naick, M R Forwood, W Ambrosius, M S Hasan, R Pidaparti.   

Abstract

It has never been demonstrated that microcrack accumulation in bone leads to impaired mechanical properties. We hypothesized that microdamage accumulation is positively and linearly correlated with a reduction in bone's elastic modulus. We also tested the hypothesis that damage accumulates more rapidly in tensile cortices, but crack growth is greater in compressive cortices. Canine femurs (n = 26) were tested in four-point cyclic bending under load control until they had lost between 5 and 43% of their stiffness. Ten femurs were used as nonloaded controls. The loaded portion of the bone was stained en bloc with basic fuchsin to detect the presence of microdamage. The number of stained microcracks, their lengths and the area of damaged bone were measured under the microscope. Crack numerical density, surface density, mean crack length, and the percentage of damaged area were calculated. Significant microdamage accumulation was not detected until the bone had lost 15% of its elastic modulus. The relationship between crack density and stiffness loss was approximately quadratic, but the relationship between damaged area and stiffness loss was linear. There were significantly more microcracks in tensile cortices, but on average cracks were significantly longer in compressive cortices. We conclude that microcrack accumulation impairs the mechanical properties of bone by reducing its elastic modulus. We also conclude that damage accumulates more rapidly in tensile cortices, but crack growth is greater in compressive cortices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9672087     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00016-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  88 in total

1.  Microdamage and mechanical behaviour: predicting failure and remodelling in compact bone.

Authors:  D Taylor; T C Lee
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Microdamage and bone strength.

Authors:  David Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Muscle dysfunction versus wear and tear as a cause of exercise related osteoarthritis: an epidemiological update.

Authors:  Ian Shrier
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Microcracks and osteoclast resorption activity in vitro.

Authors:  Monika Rumpler; Tanja Würger; Paul Roschger; Elisabeth Zwettler; Herwig Peterlik; Peter Fratzl; Klaus Klaushofer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Prediction of microdamage formation using a mineral-collagen composite model of bone.

Authors:  Xiaodu Wang; Chunjiang Qian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Age-related factors affecting the postyield energy dissipation of human cortical bone.

Authors:  Jeffry S Nyman; Anuradha Roy; Jerrod H Tyler; Rae L Acuna; Heather J Gayle; Xiaodu Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 7.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Bone microdamage: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  R D Chapurlat; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  In vivo microdamage is an indicator of susceptibility to initiation and propagation of microdamage in human femoral trabecular bone.

Authors:  Ziheng Wu; Anthony J Laneve; Glen L Niebur
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 10.  From estrogen-centric to aging and oxidative stress: a revised perspective of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stavros C Manolagas
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.