Literature DB >> 9672083

Finite element analysis of the implanted proximal tibia: a relationship between the initial cancellous bone stresses and implant migration.

M Taylor1, K E Tanner, M A Freeman.   

Abstract

The cancellous bone stresses within the implanted proximal tibia were examined using a three-dimensional anatomical finite element model. Three versions of a proximal tibial prosthesis were examined: an all polyethylene press-fit design; a metal backed, stemmed press-fit design and a (horizontally) cemented metal backed, stemmed design. All three designs had published migration and survivorship data. The objectives of the study were (i) to compare the stresses generated by each of the tibial components, (ii) examine the influence of the resected surface morphology and (iii) compare the initial cancellous bone stresses with the published migration and survivorship data. The all polyethylene prosthesis generated the highest cancellous bone stresses. Addition of a metal backing and a stem reduced the stresses, but the cemented device produced the lowest cancellous bone stresses. The surface morphology had a significant effect on the cancellous bone stresses generated by press-fit prostheses. As the bone-prosthesis contact area decreased, the peak cancellous bone stresses increased by as much as 243%. The surface morphology had no effect on the cancellous bone stresses generated by the cemented implant. Good correlation was found between the predicted cancellous bone stresses and the migration and survivorship data, with the implant generating the highest cancellous bone stresses migrating the most and having the poorest survival rates at 5 year. The results support the hypothesis that the progressive failure of cancellous bone is a mechanism of implant migration regardless of the method of fixation and the implantation site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9672083     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00022-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

Review 1.  Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Xiaoyun Pan; Tao Liu; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.

Authors:  S M Thompson; D Yohuno; W N Bradley; A D Crocombe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effect of tibial drill-guide angle on the mechanical environment at bone tunnel aperture after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jie Yao; Chun Yi Wen; Ming Zhang; Jason Tak-Man Cheung; Chunhoi Yan; Kwong-Yuen Chiu; William Weijia Lu; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  In vivo loss of cement-bone interlock reduces fixation strength in total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Jacklyn R Goodheart; Mark A Miller; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean Brihault; Alessandro Navacchia; Silvia Pianigiani; Luc Labey; Ronny De Corte; Valerio Pascale; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Peri-implant bone strains and micro-motion following in vivo service: a postmortem retrieval study of 22 tibial components from total knee replacements.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Mark A Miller; Jacklyn R Goodheart; Timothy H Izant; Richard J Cleary
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Metal-backed versus all-polyethylene tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Guoyou Zhang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Biomechanical Effect of UHMWPE and CFR-PEEK Insert on Tibial Component in Unicompartmental Knee Replacement in Different Varus and Valgus Alignments.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Hyoung-Taek Hong; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study.

Authors:  Ola L A Harrysson; Yasser A Hosni; Jamal F Nayfeh
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Periprosthetic tibial bone mineral density changes after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Antti Jaroma; Tarja Soininvaara; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.