Literature DB >> 9671942

Endogenous inflammatory response to dermal wound healing in the fetal and adult mouse.

A J Cowin1, M P Brosnan, T M Holmes, M W Ferguson.   

Abstract

The recruitment of inflammatory cells to a wound may play an important role in the resulting cellular processes and ultimately the quality of the healing response in the fetus (scar-free healing) or the adult (scar-forming healing). Using a range of antibodies to monocytes and macrophages and also to different activation markers of activated macrophages, we have compared the inflammatory profile of scar-free healing E16 mouse fetal wounds to those of scarring adult wounds. In the fetal wound, small numbers of monocyte derived cells (MOMA-2 and F4/80 positive) are recruited to the wound by 3 hr post-wounding. No Mac-1 positive cells indicative of activated macrophages were observed until 18 hr post-wounding. Eventually all types of macrophages studied were recruited to both adult and fetal wound sites but the numbers and persistence of these cells are lower in the fetus than in the adult. B cells were detected in healing adult wounds but not in the fetal wounds. This absence of H-21-A positive (B) cells in murine fetal wounds could be associated with the low levels of activated Mac-1 positive macrophages at the murine fetal wound site. Activated macrophages in addition to releasing growth factors may also release signals to recruit B cells. Thus, the E16 mouse fetus can mount an inflammatory response to wounding. This response differs from that of the adult in the numbers of inflammatory cells recruited to the wound and the subpopulations of activated cells found at the wound site. This study indicates that there are complex differences between the inflammatory responses elicited in adult and fetal murine dermal wounds. These differences may determine the profile of growth factors and cytokines released at fetal and adult wound sites. Manipulation of either the numbers or the activation states of inflammatory cells at the adult wound site may be an approach to the control of scarring during adult wound healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9671942     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199807)212:3<385::AID-AJA6>3.0.CO;2-D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  62 in total

Review 1.  Chemokine Involvement in Fetal and Adult Wound Healing.

Authors:  Swathi Balaji; Carey L Watson; Rajeev Ranjan; Alice King; Paul L Bollyky; Sundeep G Keswani
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration.

Authors:  Anthony D Metcalfe; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The alarmin HMGB-1 influences healing outcomes in fetal skin wounds.

Authors:  Adrienne D Dardenne; Brian C Wulff; Traci A Wilgus
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  Regenerative Scar-Free Skin Wound Healing.

Authors:  Mehri Monavarian; Safaa Kader; Seyedsina Moeinzadeh; Esmaiel Jabbari
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 5.  Wound repair: toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses.

Authors:  Kevin J Sonnemann; William M Bement
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 13.827

Review 6.  Skin-Associated B Cells in Health and Inflammation.

Authors:  Gudrun F Debes; Shannon E McGettigan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Systemic Delivery of Anti-Integrin αL Antibodies Reduces Early Macrophage Recruitment, Inflammation, and Scar Formation in Murine Burn Wounds.

Authors:  Xanthe L Strudwick; Damian H Adams; Natasha T Pyne; Michael S Samuel; Rachael Z Murray; Allison J Cowin
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Stem cell paracrine actions and tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Priya R Baraniak; Todd C McDevitt
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.806

9.  Cutaneous scarring: a clinical review.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Fulvio Urso-Baiarda; Claire Linge; Adriaan Grobbelaar
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-02-10

10.  Therapeutic improvement of scarring: mechanisms of scarless and scar-forming healing and approaches to the discovery of new treatments.

Authors:  Nick L Occleston; Anthony D Metcalfe; Adam Boanas; Nicholas J Burgoyne; Kerry Nield; Sharon O'Kane; Mark W J Ferguson
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.