OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily summarize the clinical outcomes of the transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound procedure using the prototype Sonablate (HIFU1) and the new Sonablate-200 (HIFU2) for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: We treated 35 and 22 patients with HIFU1 and HIFU2, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were made using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) data, and the results of uroflowmetry and transrectal ultrasound, and any complications were noted. RESULTS: IPSS and QOL scores showed significant improvement after using both HIFU1 and HIFU2 at 3, 6, and 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.0001 to < 0.01; Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). Maximum flow rate (8.9 to 15.5 mL/s, P < 0.001) and prostatic volume (32.2 to 22.8 mL, P < 0.01) were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively in patients who underwent HIFU2 treatment but not in patients who underwent HIFU1. Two hematospermia and one gross hematuria in patients treated with HIFU1 and one epididymitis in a patient treated with HIFU2 were seen but no severe complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Focused ultrasound is an effective new technology by which tissue can be destroyed at a site distant from the source of energy without damaging surrounding tissue. The clinical efficacy of HIFU2 was superior to that of the prototype HIFU1.
OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily summarize the clinical outcomes of the transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound procedure using the prototype Sonablate (HIFU1) and the new Sonablate-200 (HIFU2) for treating symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS: We treated 35 and 22 patients with HIFU1 and HIFU2, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were made using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) data, and the results of uroflowmetry and transrectal ultrasound, and any complications were noted. RESULTS: IPSS and QOL scores showed significant improvement after using both HIFU1 and HIFU2 at 3, 6, and 12 months, postoperatively (P < 0.0001 to < 0.01; Wilcoxon signed-ranks test). Maximum flow rate (8.9 to 15.5 mL/s, P < 0.001) and prostatic volume (32.2 to 22.8 mL, P < 0.01) were significantly improved at 12 months postoperatively in patients who underwent HIFU2 treatment but not in patients who underwent HIFU1. Two hematospermia and one gross hematuria in patients treated with HIFU1 and one epididymitis in a patient treated with HIFU2 were seen but no severe complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Focused ultrasound is an effective new technology by which tissue can be destroyed at a site distant from the source of energy without damaging surrounding tissue. The clinical efficacy of HIFU2 was superior to that of the prototype HIFU1.