Literature DB >> 9670942

Qualitative differences between naive and memory T cells make a major contribution to the more rapid and efficient memory CD8+ T cell response.

R M Kedl1, M F Mescher.   

Abstract

CD8+ T cells are present at a higher frequency following a primary response, and these memory cells exhibit qualitative differences from naive cells. The importance of these differences vs increased precursor frequency in making a memory response more rapid and efficient has been unclear. Adoptive transfer of 2C TCR transgenic CD8+ T cells into normal recipients, followed by i.p. challenge with allogeneic P815 tumor, results in a long-lived memory population that includes both endogenous host CD8+ T cells and 2C cells. The 2C cells can be identified, using 1B2 mAb specific for the TCR, and thus used as an indicator of the properties of the memory cells. The memory cells have a heterogeneous surface phenotype, and their distribution in lymphoid organs, blood, and peripheral sites is distinct from that of naive cells. Upon rechallenge with Ag, memory cells access the peritoneal cavity much more rapidly than do naive cells (12 h vs 5 days). This appears to result from a requirement for naive cells to interact with Ag before they can efficiently migrate to inflammatory sites, while this is not required for memory cells. In addition, memory cells exhibit some cytolytic activity before rechallenge with Ag, and potent cytolytic activity is present in the peritoneal cavity within 12 h of rechallenge. Comparison of primary and memory responses in mice having similar frequencies of Ag-specific precursors demonstrated that the more rapid migration and the immediate effector function of at least some memory cells contribute very substantially to making a memory response at a peripheral site more rapid and efficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9670942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  18 in total

1.  Complementary costimulation of human T-cell subpopulations by cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28) and CD81.

Authors:  Yael Sagi; Angela Landrigan; Ronald Levy; Shoshana Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selective targeting of human alloresponsive CD8+ effector memory T cells based on CD2 expression.

Authors:  D J Lo; T A Weaver; L Stempora; A K Mehta; M L Ford; C P Larsen; A D Kirk
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Effector CD4 cells are tolerized upon exposure to parenchymal self-antigen.

Authors:  Amy D Higgins; Marianne A Mihalyo; Adam J Adler
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Costimulation of naive human CD4 T cells through intercellular adhesion molecule-1 promotes differentiation to a memory phenotype that is not strictly the result of multiple rounds of cell division.

Authors:  Jacob E Kohlmeier; Marcia A Chan; Stephen H Benedict
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 5.  Cellular immunity and memory to respiratory virus infections.

Authors:  D L Woodland; R J Hogan; W Zhong
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.829

6.  Functional differences between memory and naive CD8 T cells.

Authors:  B K Cho; C Wang; S Sugawa; H N Eisen; J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Induced Sézary syndrome PBMCs poorly express immune response genes up-regulated in stimulated memory T cells.

Authors:  Benjamin F Chong; Patrick Dantzer; Thomas Germeroth; Mikehl Hafner; Adam J Wilson; Guanghua Xiao; Henry K Wong
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.563

8.  The roles of CD8 central and effector memory T-cell subsets in allograft rejection.

Authors:  M H Oberbarnscheidt; Y-H Ng; G Chalasani
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Robust recall and long-term memory T-cell responses induced by prime-boost regimens with heterologous live viral vectors expressing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag and Env proteins.

Authors:  Karl Haglund; Ingrid Leiner; Kristen Kerksiek; Linda Buonocore; Eric Pamer; John K Rose
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Bioluminescence-based visualization of CD4 T cell dynamics using a T lineage-specific luciferase transgenic model.

Authors:  Joseph H Chewning; Kari J Dugger; Tandra R Chaudhuri; Kurt R Zinn; Casey T Weaver
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.