Literature DB >> 9670532

On loudness at threshold.

S Buus1, H Müsch, M Florentine.   

Abstract

Absolute thresholds for and loudness matches between pure tones and four- and ten-tone complexes were used to assess the form of the function relating loudness to sensation level, SL, at low and moderate levels. The components of the tone complexes had equal SLs and were separated by one, two, four, or six critical bands. Six listeners with normal hearing were tested. The thresholds for the multitone complexes indicate that they generally can be detected even when the level of a single component is a few dB below the threshold. The average detection advantage is consistent with predictions for multiple observations in independent, frequency-selective auditory channels, but differences among listeners are apparent. The loudness matches also vary somewhat among listeners. Five of the six listeners matched tone complexes composed of subthreshold components to a pure tone a few dB above threshold. This indicates that the loudness of tones at or even below threshold is greater than zero for these five listeners. A simple model of loudness summation was used to obtain loudness functions from the individual listeners' loudness matches. The slopes of the loudness functions [log(loudness) plotted as a function of log(intensity)] generally exceed unity at low levels and are near 0.2 at 40 dB SL. This shallow slope at moderate levels agrees with loudness functions derived from data on temporal integration of loudness. The average loudness function derived from the present data also is in good agreement with a variety of previous data obtained by magnitude estimation, magnitude production, ratio production, and measurements of binaural loudness summation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9670532     DOI: 10.1121/1.423295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Objective estimation of loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Ikaro Silva; Michael Epstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Threshold and beyond: modeling the intensity dependence of auditory responses.

Authors:  Bernd Lütkenhöner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-14

3.  Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

5.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness.

Authors:  Megan J Thorson; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  Facilitated auditory detection for speech sounds.

Authors:  Carine Signoret; Etienne Gaudrain; Barbara Tillmann; Nicolas Grimault; Fabien Perrin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-26

7.  Spectral and binaural loudness summation of equally loud narrowband signals in single-sided-deafness and bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Hongmei Hu; Laura Hartog; Birger Kollmeier; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  Are auditory percepts determined by experience?

Authors:  Brian B Monson; Shui'Er Han; Dale Purves
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.