Literature DB >> 9670387

Effect of intrathecal nimodipine on spinal cord blood flow and evoked potentials in the normal or injured cord.

H Imamura1, C H Tator.   

Abstract

A method was developed for administering intrathecal pharmacotherapy in a rat model of spinal cord injury. The effects of intrathecal administration of nimodipine on spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) and evoked potentials (EPs) were measured in the normal and injured spinal cord. It had previously been shown that systemic nimodipine caused severe hypotension after spinal cord injury. After baseline SCBF and EPs, 15 uninjured rats were blindly allocated to one of three groups: one placebo group (n = 5); and two groups with intrathecal nimodipine, 0.05 mg/kg (n = 5), or 0.2 mg/kg (n = 5). Ten other rats received a 35 g acute clip compression injury of the spinal cord for 1 minute and, were allocated to one of two groups: placebo (n = 5); and intrathecal nimodipine 0.05 mg/kg (n = 5) given 60 min after injury. In the uninjured groups, neither 0.05 nor 0.2 mg/kg of nimodipine increased SCBF during, or 30 min after, intrathecal infusion. However, the mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) decreased significantly to 69.73.1% after the infusion of 0.2 mg/kg nimodipine and did not recover by 98 min. In all three groups of uninjured rats, the amplitude of the cerebellar EP was decreased 30 min after infusion. After spinal cord injury, there were significant decreases in MABP, SCBF and EP amplitude in both placebo and treatment groups, but there was no therapeutic benefit from nimodipine. Thus, intrathecal infusion of nimodipine did not prevent the hypotension encountered with systemic administration and exerted no beneficial effect on SCBF or EPs after acute spinal cord injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9670387     DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  3 in total

1.  Enhanced analgesic effect of morphine-nimodipine combination after intraspinal administration as compared to systemic administration in mice.

Authors:  Dilip Verma; Subrata Basu Ray; Ishan Patro; Shashi Wadhwa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Chemical priming for spinal cord injury: a review of the literature part II-potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Martin M Mortazavi; Ketan Verma; Aman Deep; Fatemeh B Esfahani; Patrick R Pritchard; R Shane Tubbs; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Chemical priming for spinal cord injury: a review of the literature. Part I-factors involved.

Authors:  Martin M Mortazavi; Ketan Verma; Aman Deep; Fatemeh B Esfahani; Patrick R Pritchard; R Shane Tubbs; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 1.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.